royals119
Registered User
As I already said, I started following minor league hockey (Royals directly, AHL indirectly) in 2001. I closely followed the news of a potential Pacific division in the years leading up to 2014, since the Royals were affiliated with the Kings and Monarchs, and Dean Lombardi was one of the more publically vocal proponents of the idea while GM of the Kings. I'm not sure about "inner workings", as probably only league employees, team owners and employees, and maybe some reporters would be privy to that.and again, I ask the question, Royals, how attune were you to the inner workings of the AHL, from the late 70s until 2015.....
the Pacific Division had been in the background for at least 20 years before it was executed in 2014, which is why both Manchester and Worcester disappeared in 2014, because of the decision made by LA AND SJ (remember Worcester was in the initial discussions with SJ about extending their contract before breaking off those discussions.
it was also stated had it been not approved in 2014..... it would've been done by the end of the decade
Also, really has nothing to do with your assertion that the Pacific division was shown favoritism in regard to scheduling. You seem to be forgetting, the eastern teams didn't want the reduced schedule, the western teams did. They agreed to a compromise. If the eastern teams had wanted to play less games, they clearly could have done that.