Tyler Myers hit on Joel Armia (no discipline)

Kreegz2

Registered User
Dec 11, 2011
919
809
I think people expecting great retribution tonight from the Habs are going to be sorely disappointed. Players in the game today just aren’t like that for the most part.

Maybe 10 years ago, yes, Armia’s teammates would avenge him, and Myers and the Jets would pay for it for the entirety of the game but at worst, the Habs are going to send someone after Myers, who is equally a poor fighter, and even if Myers obliges them, they’ll likely hug it out for 30 seconds and then the game will go on like the last game never even happened.

Sadly you are right. There isn't enough hatred left in the game anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DickSmehlik

CherryToke

Registered User
Oct 18, 2008
26,735
8,218
Coquitlam
I think people expecting great retribution tonight from the Habs are going to be sorely disappointed. Players in the game today just aren’t like that for the most part.

Maybe 10 years ago, yes, Armia’s teammates would avenge him, and Myers and the Jets would pay for it for the entirety of the game but at worst, the Habs are going to send someone after Myers, who is equally a poor fighter, and even if Myers obliges them, they’ll likely hug it out for 30 seconds and then the game will go on like the last game never even happened.

Not sure why the Jets would have to pay for it
 

DickSmehlik

Registered User
Oct 23, 2006
3,763
3,785
The Empire State
Not sure why the Jets would have to pay for it
Myers took out a non fighter for the Canadians, the unwritten rule used to state Myers would have to answer the bell in the next game, and Montreal would take a run at one of the Jets players.

But this isn’t the standard practice nowadays.
 

ijuka

Registered User
May 14, 2016
22,545
15,221
Not even a hearing for a clear headhunting attempt, a vicious attempt to injure.

And this is the league that constantly talks about how much they care about player safety.
 

DFF

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
22,330
6,576
Myers took out a non fighter for the Canadians, the unwritten rule used to state Myers would have to answer the bell in the next game, and Montreal would take a run at one of the Jets players.

But this isn’t the standard practice nowadays.

You were watching the wrong game
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rangers ftw

Mattb124

Registered User
Apr 29, 2011
6,576
4,015
The rule book is irrelevant. They don't follow it. They make up a story (usually incomprehensible} to justify whatever ruling they want too make.

Quite the contrary. Most posters are calling for a suspension based on factors that aren't in the rulebook and hence are not directly relevant. To that end, many posters are mad the the NHL followed the rulebook rather than what they think the rules "should" be.
 

SensontheRush

Never said it was Sunshine
Apr 27, 2010
4,749
2,663
Ottawa
Armia literally wasn't looking where he was going, and had the puck.

Stupid. This wasn't a "scrum along the boards", Armia was moving the whole time and was spatially oblivious.
 

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
4,763
2,251
Armia literally wasn't looking where he was going, and had the puck.

Stupid. This wasn't a "scrum along the boards", Armia was moving the whole time and was spatially oblivious.
Exactly, Armia doesn't change direction and doesn't see Myers coming. Instead of giving Armia a solid body check on Armia' shoulder/body, Myers go directly for the head.
 

SensontheRush

Never said it was Sunshine
Apr 27, 2010
4,749
2,663
Ottawa
Exactly, Armia doesn't change direction and doesn't see Myers coming. Instead of giving Armia a solid body check on Armia' shoulder/body, Myers go directly for the head.

You can tell it's not a hit to head because his neck doesn't whip back and forth.

It's a big boy blast to the sternum.
 

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
4,763
2,251
You can tell it's not a hit to head because his neck doesn't whip back and forth.

It's a big boy blast to the sternum.
The angle Myers use on his hit is to hit him in the head not full body. If he was aiming for a full body check he would have made contact with Armia's left arm/shoulder first.

If you watch all angles, he hits him in the head. That's what 99% of people here see anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeune Poulet

SensontheRush

Never said it was Sunshine
Apr 27, 2010
4,749
2,663
Ottawa
The angle Myers use on his hit is to hit him in the head not full body. If he was aiming for a full body check he would have made contact with Armia's left arm/shoulder first.

If you watch all angles, he hits him in the head. That's what 99% of people here see anyway.

Myers was a little ahead of the play, so his hit wasn't perfectly timed. No big deal.

Upon review, Myers is slightly hunched over, and in the split-second Armia runs into him (Myers is in front of Armia), Myers straightens his back and this makes his shoulder go straight into Armia's sternum.

It's science buddy. It's not a headshot, if there was, whiplash would be clearly evident. Same thing happens in car crashes. This is a clean hit, I don't care what the homers say.
 

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
4,763
2,251
Myers was a little ahead of the play, so his hit wasn't perfectly timed. No big deal.

Upon review, Myers is slightly hunched over, and in the split-second Armia runs into him (Myers is in front of Armia), Myers straightens his back and this makes his shoulder go straight into Armia's sternum.

It's science buddy. It's not a headshot, if there was, whiplash would be clearly evident. Same thing happens in car crashes. This is a clean hit, I don't care what the homers say.
He clearly hits him in the head, not sure how that's even debatable.
 

SensontheRush

Never said it was Sunshine
Apr 27, 2010
4,749
2,663
Ottawa
He clearly hits him in the head, not sure how that's even debatable.

It's science buddy. It's not a headshot, if there was, whiplash would be clearly evident. Same thing happens in car crashes. This is a clean hit, I don't care what the homers say.

whiplash would be clearly evident

whiplash would be clearly evident

whiplash would be clearly evident

whiplash would be clearly evident

whiplash would be clearly evident

His whole chest and head move in unison. This is key. This is what you have to look for. It's a clean hit.

It's factually and obviously not a headshot.

There is not a single headshot in the history of Hockey with no discernible whiplash.
 
Last edited:

bandwagonesque

I eat Kraft Dinner and I vote
Mar 5, 2014
7,153
5,471
When you watch the clip, it's clear the head isn't the principle point of contact. He hits him in the upper chest and grazes his head a bit.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad