Keep those proposals coming. Somebody has to say yes eventually...
More goals, more points.
downgrade?
While Danault plays on 1st line with Tatar and Gallagher.More Panarin too.
What has he done the couple last season?
Not much
Same age, Strome has 254 points in the NHL Danault has 175downgrade?
While Danault plays on 1st line with Tatar and Gallagher.
Danault as a 1st liner had 53 points last season and 12 goals, this year 13 goals and 49 points....man y'all overvalue Danault like crazy.
While Danault plays on 1st line with Tatar and Gallagher.
Danault as a 1st liner had 53 points last season and 12 goals, this year 13 goals and 49 points....man y'all overvalue Danault like crazy.
Danault without tatar, Gallagher and leading mins what is he? a 30 point 3rd line center?You're overrating Strome, without Panarin he's a 30pts 3rd Line center.... Danault at least is one of the best defensive center in the NHL.
Keep those proposals coming. Somebody has to say yes eventually...
Danault without tatar, Gallagher and leading mins what is he? a 30 point 3rd line center?
And, hopefully, the desperate. Bergevin may not admit to a window for his roster, but he probably realizes his own window is starting to shut. If he wants to achieve anything as GM, he'll have to pull himself away from the flea market of mid-tier players and sit down at the high stakes poker table.Fortune favours the bold.
Which leaves us in the exact same spot, only with different names on the jerseys. Getting Killorn fresh from his Cup win is good marketing and might even improve the team by a meter. Problem is we're 10 meters from shore.That's where my mind is at too. I don't hate Killorn but once you make that trade, you are committed to him taking up a chunk of the cap. If you add Killorn... 1 or 2 of these gone... Domi, Byron, Tatar.
I'd be very curious to see how Danault would do with Byron and Lehkonen over a full season.
I hope we find out.I'd be very curious to see how Danault would do with Byron and Lehkonen over a full season.
I wonder how Strome would do with Gallagher and Tatar? I mean without Panarin we know that Strome is at least a 13 goal a year center if not more.I'd like to see Danault does with Panarin too.
If that's what we wanna compare.
Danault > Strome
We can all agree on that minus 1 person probably.
That name David Ettedgui sounds familiar. Who is that again?
I would actually prefer Danault as a 3rd liner as long as he knows that and Julien knows that. Strome is, despite what people on here would suggest probably without watching a single rags game, a much better offensive player. He has the instincts to compliment the cerebral game of a Panarin. Danault is a mucker hence why he found success with Gallagher on his line. They really weren't a pretty line to watch but more of your typical Habs lunchbox line (Lets face it we haven't seen gamebreaking skill on this roster since Kovalev)I'm more than good in keeping Danault.
But Ryan Strome as a 3C isn't an option I'd be mad at. If he can be a 30+ point 3C, I'd say that's a good thing. If Danault plays 3C full time and not with the two top scoring wingers in Tatar and Gallagher, he'd also be a 30+ point 3C.