Dreger came out and said it was almost a done trade 1 for 1, go ask Dreger to substantiate the claim. If it's coming from Dreger, it's very likely to be credible.
Funny, doesn’t Dreger get slammed in here? Also, what does almost a done deal mean? Did Edmonton pull out?
Seems like a bit of a reach to be using as a fact to brain our GM with no?
Pretty sure that’s the point I’m making. There are lots of legitimate things to take an angry perspective about.
Also, there seems to be some confusion about questioning the legitimacy of ‘facts’. When someone presents something as fact it’s on them to prove it so. In a trial for instance, the accused doesn’t have to prove their innocence only draw doubt concerning the facts presented
It’s not on me to prove buddies rumour is false, by vary definition the rumour isn’t a fact and shouldn’t be used as such.