Speculation: Trade & Free Agency Talk XXXIII

Status
Not open for further replies.

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
39,649
18,066
Okposo literally falls into the category of last players we need. Overpaid, underperforming old wingers that don’t move the needle.

We need to trade 2-3 of our wingers so we have less of them. Doesn’t make sense to acquire more in the trades.
 

DeagleJenkins

Registered User
Jul 17, 2018
5,320
1,331
Minnesota
Okposo literally falls into the category of last players we need. Overpaid, underperforming old wingers that don’t move the needle.

We need to trade 2-3 of our wingers so we have less of them. Doesn’t make sense to acquire more in the trades.
could get Scandella back and track brodin. not a huge upgrade but Scandella is more physical and offensive.
 

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
39,649
18,066
could get Scandella back and track brodin. not a huge upgrade but Scandella is more physical and offensive.

Huge fan of Scandella, but the only way this makes any sense is if Brodin is traded first, and Scandella is added in addition to the picks/prospects to even out any salary.
 

HaNotsri

Regstred User
Dec 29, 2013
8,176
6,031
I think Okposo's probably the last problem we need.

I'm pretty lukewarm on Mittetstadt personally, at least as a center. Not sure how others feel about him at this point.
Okposo was more of a scorched earth rebuild kind of option. You’d get a premium to take him and he would play his heart out for you guys while you tank.

Scandella looks like his old self, ufa after this year so you could probably get him for free then but it would make sense for Buffalo to trade him if we upgrade our lhd. In a vacuum he is our 4th best lhd right now.
 

DeagleJenkins

Registered User
Jul 17, 2018
5,320
1,331
Minnesota
Huge fan of Scandella, but the only way this makes any sense is if Brodin is traded first, and Scandella is added in addition to the picks/prospects to even out any salary.
oh I agree, it would be 2 separate trades like brodin to montreal for poehling and a pick (which I think some mtl fans offered randomly) then we go get Scandella and a pick or good prospect for zucker.
 

Bazeek

Registered Lurker
Sponsor
Jul 26, 2011
17,883
11,253
Exiled in Madison
Okposo was more of a scorched earth rebuild kind of option. You’d get a premium to take him and he would play his heart out for you guys while you tank.

Scandella looks like his old self, ufa after this year so you could probably get him for free then but it would make sense for Buffalo to trade him if we upgrade our lhd. In a vacuum he is our 4th best lhd right now.
I am not entirely against Okposo for Parise.
 

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
39,649
18,066
I am not entirely against Okposo for Parise.

Cap recapture still looms. Risky to move him. The buyout after 2021-22 isn’t that bad and that’s still a year sooner than Okposo’s ends.
 

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
45,324
20,241
MinneSNOWta
Does anybody know and/or can somebody post what the recapture penalties would be if retired here or retired after he was traded? Maybe even for each year remaining? It would be nice to have some sort of number to wrap my head around.
 

Dickie Dunn

Registered User
Jan 4, 2016
2,986
1,455
Minneapolis
Are we assuming Parise has cratered at this point and there is no hope of him playing his way out of this funk? I'm legit curious as I haven't watched a lot yet but from what I am hearing and reading between the lines is that he lost not only a step from last year but possibly 2-3 steps.
 

Dickie Dunn

Registered User
Jan 4, 2016
2,986
1,455
Minneapolis
Does anybody know and/or can somebody post what the recapture penalties would be if retired here or retired after he was traded? Maybe even for each year remaining? It would be nice to have some sort of number to wrap my head around.

I couldn't find a nice breakdown by year but I found this from a 'cap recapture' article from 2017 which was looking at players league wide.

"Parise (33) and Suter (32) still have eight seasons remaining on their respective deals. If one of them retires in 2020, the cap recapture is over $3.9 million for each of the remaining years. If one or both retire in 2021, it jumps to over $5 million annually."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr Jan Itor

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
39,649
18,066
Does anybody know and/or can somebody post what the recapture penalties would be if retired here or retired after he was traded? Maybe even for each year remaining? It would be nice to have some sort of number to wrap my head around.

From my understanding....

This assumes he plays out the rest of this season. Right now his cap benefit is roughly 19.2M. Which means we've paid him 19.2M more in cash than his cap hit has added up to for the years he's been here.
If he retires after this season, that 19.2M will be divided by the number of remaining years on his contract (5), giving us a dead cap hit of 3.84 for those years.

If he retires after 2020-21 it's 4.9M for the final four years.

If he retires after 2021-22 it's 6.1M for the final three years

If he retires after 2022-23 it's 6.35M for the final two years

If he retires after 2023-24 it's 6.2M for the final year

If we trade him, the net cap benefit stops moving for us, but will be divided by the number of years he had left to hit us.

So if we trade him after this season with a cap benefit of 19.2M for us, and he plays for that team until after 2022-23, and retires with two years left on his contract, that 19.2M will be divided by 2 and we'll have that dead cap penalty against us for those final two years. So that would be 9.6M per season.
 

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
45,324
20,241
MinneSNOWta
Does anybody know and/or can somebody post what the recapture penalties would be if retired here or retired after he was traded? Maybe even for each year remaining? It would be nice to have some sort of number to wrap my head around.

And a follow up question: is it possible for he and the Wild to mutually terminate his contract, thereby negating any recapture and allowing him to be a UFA. Obviously he'd be giving up some money, but after this season, he's owed $18M so maybe if he thought he could get ~$10M of that back playing in a "better situation" he'd be amenable to it?
 

StateofCelly

Registered User
Jan 5, 2017
740
271
Are we assuming Parise has cratered at this point and there is no hope of him playing his way out of this funk? I'm legit curious as I haven't watched a lot yet but from what I am hearing and reading between the lines is that he lost not only a step from last year but possibly 2-3 steps.

It is like hes on the rink with plastic shoes instead of sharpened skates. Feet just aren't moving. So not only speed, but for a guy who makes his living planted in front of the net, its like hes just behind on everything. That goal Mayhew scored would have been a typical Parise type rebound, but anymore hes stuck churning his feet and never gets around to the open side of the net.
 

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
39,649
18,066
And a follow up question: is it possible for he and the Wild to mutually terminate his contract, thereby negating any recapture and allowing him to be a UFA. Obviously he'd be giving up some money, but after this season, he's owed $18M so maybe if he thought he could get ~$10M of that back playing in a "better situation" he'd be amenable to it?

Not that I know of. The only way to get out of a contract completely is a buy out.

Our best option for him is that he LTIRetires ASAP
Second best is we buy him out in the 2022 buyout window (I think this is the best year?)
Him retiring with us would technically save us cap space, but we'd also have a significant cap penalty for the duration of his contract, so it's not really a good option
Trading him isn't an option, at all
 

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
45,324
20,241
MinneSNOWta
I couldn't find a nice breakdown by year but I found this from a 'cap recapture' article from 2017 which was looking at players league wide.

"Parise (33) and Suter (32) still have eight seasons remaining on their respective deals. If one of them retires in 2020, the cap recapture is over $3.9 million for each of the remaining years. If one or both retire in 2021, it jumps to over $5 million annually."

From my understanding....

This assumes he plays out the rest of this season. Right now his cap benefit is roughly 19.2M. Which means we've paid him 19.2M more in cash than his cap hit has added up to for the years he's been here.
If he retires after this season, that 19.2M will be divided by the number of remaining years on his contract (5), giving us a dead cap hit of 3.84 for those years.

If he retires after 2020-21 it's 4.9M for the final four years.

If he retires after 2021-22 it's 6.1M for the final three years

If he retires after 2022-23 it's 6.35M for the final two years

If he retires after 2023-24 it's 6.2M for the final year

If we trade him, the net cap benefit stops moving for us, but will be divided by the number of years he had left to hit us.

So if we trade him after this season with a cap benefit of 19.2M for us, and he plays for that team until after 2022-23, and retires with two years left on his contract, that 19.2M will be divided by 2 and we'll have that dead cap penalty against us for those final two years. So that would be 9.6M per season.

Many thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dickie Dunn

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
45,324
20,241
MinneSNOWta
Not that I know of. The only way to get out of a contract completely is a buy out.

Our best option for him is that he LTIRetires ASAP
Second best is we buy him out in the 2022 buyout window (I think this is the best year?)
Him retiring with us would technically save us cap space, but we'd also have a significant cap penalty for the duration of his contract, so it's not really a good option
Trading him isn't an option, at all

I thought NJ and Kovalchuk did something like it, or the Kings and Richards? Maybe not.
 

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
39,649
18,066
I thought NJ and Kovalchuk did something like it, or the Kings and Richards? Maybe not.

Kovalchuk retired, but the cap benefit for the four years he was there was only 4M. NJ is paying a 300k per season recap penalty until 2024-25.

Coming back from Russia, NJ had to give permission for him to speak with other teams, I believe. And Kovalchuk had to wait X number of years before he could.

I'm not familiar with what happened with the Kings and Mike Richards, so maybe there's something there.
 

Bazeek

Registered Lurker
Sponsor
Jul 26, 2011
17,883
11,253
Exiled in Madison
I couldn't find a nice breakdown by year but I found this from a 'cap recapture' article from 2017 which was looking at players league wide.

"Parise (33) and Suter (32) still have eight seasons remaining on their respective deals. If one of them retires in 2020, the cap recapture is over $3.9 million for each of the remaining years. If one or both retire in 2021, it jumps to over $5 million annually."
I'm skeptical of those numbers, but I might be missing something. It's hard to find anyone actually showing their work on this.

I'll take a swing at it. I don't think this is entirely correct, but at least it's something to point at.

The core of the whole thing is the "Cap Benefit," which is the cumulative difference between the contract's cap hit and actual salary. This Net Benefit is highest right as the relationship switches and the cap hits are higher than the actual salary, but beyond that the CB turns negative and the Net CB declines until it hits zero at the end of the contract. So Parise retiring at the inflection point in 2021 would incur the worst penalty, while retiring near the end of the contract in 2023 wouldn't be all that bad.

With all that said, here's my crack at the numbers.

SeasonAgeSalaryCap HitCap benefitNet Cap BenefitYears remainingAnnual penalty… in millions
2012-132811,170,7327,538,4623,632,2703,632,27013279405.38460.279405385
2013-1429120000007,538,4624,461,5388,093,808126744840.674484
2014-1530110000007,538,4623,461,53811,555,3461110504861.050486
2015-163190000007,538,4621,461,53813,016,884101301688.41.3016884
2016-173290000007,538,4621,461,53814,478,42291608713.5561.608713556
2017-183390000007,538,4621,461,53815,939,960819924951.992495
2018-193490000007,538,4621,461,53817,401,49872485928.2862.485928286
2019-203590000007,538,4621,461,53818,863,03663143839.3333.143839333
2020-213680000007,538,462461,53819,324,57453864914.83.8649148
2021-223760000007,538,462-1,538,46217,786,112444465284.446528
2022-233820000007,538,462-5,538,46212,247,650340825504.08255
2023-243910000007,538,462-6,538,4625,709,188228545942.854594
2024-254010000007,538,462-6,538,462-829,2741-829274-0.829274
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
(Note that the final Net Cap Benefit isn't 0 because the sum of the cap hits doesn't equal the sum of the yearly salaries. This might be because of the bonus structure in the early years. I don't think it changes things much, though)

So going by this, if Parise retired in 2021 we'd be hit with a penalty of $3.86m for 5 years.

I've also seen references to a "max recapture period", but I'm not sure where that comes from. As I understand it the idea is that this is the max number of years that the net recapture penalty can be spread over. So if, say, the max recapture period is 2 years and Parise retires in 2021 with a net benefit of $19.3m, the cap hit would be ~$9.7m for 2 years. I'm not sure if this is really a thing, though.

Smart people, point out what's wrong here.
 

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
45,324
20,241
MinneSNOWta
Kovalchuk retired, but the cap benefit for the four years he was there was only 4M. NJ is paying a 300k per season recap penalty until 2024-25.

Coming back from Russia, NJ had to give permission for him to speak with other teams, I believe. And Kovalchuk had to wait X number of years before he could.

I'm not familiar with what happened with the Kings and Mike Richards, so maybe there's something there.

You're probably right.
 

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
39,649
18,066
I'm skeptical of those numbers, but I might be missing something. It's hard to find anyone actually showing their work on this.

I'll take a swing at it. I don't think this is entirely correct, but at least it's something to point at.

The core of the whole thing is the "Cap Benefit," which is the cumulative difference between the contract's cap hit and actual salary. This Net Benefit is highest right as the relationship switches and the cap hits are higher than the actual salary, but beyond that the CB turns negative and the Net CB declines until it hits zero at the end of the contract. So Parise retiring at the inflection point in 2021 would incur the worst penalty, while retiring near the end of the contract in 2023 wouldn't be all that bad.

With all that said, here's my crack at the numbers.

SeasonAgeSalaryCap HitCap benefitNet Cap BenefitYears remainingAnnual penalty… in millions
2012-132811,170,7327,538,4623,632,2703,632,27013279405.38460.279405385
2013-1429120000007,538,4624,461,5388,093,808126744840.674484
2014-1530110000007,538,4623,461,53811,555,3461110504861.050486
2015-163190000007,538,4621,461,53813,016,884101301688.41.3016884
2016-173290000007,538,4621,461,53814,478,42291608713.5561.608713556
2017-183390000007,538,4621,461,53815,939,960819924951.992495
2018-193490000007,538,4621,461,53817,401,49872485928.2862.485928286
2019-203590000007,538,4621,461,53818,863,03663143839.3333.143839333
2020-213680000007,538,462461,53819,324,57453864914.83.8649148
2021-223760000007,538,462-1,538,46217,786,112444465284.446528
2022-233820000007,538,462-5,538,46212,247,650340825504.08255
2023-243910000007,538,462-6,538,4625,709,188228545942.854594
2024-254010000007,538,462-6,538,462-829,2741-829274-0.829274
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
(Note that the final Net Cap Benefit isn't 0 because the sum of the cap hits doesn't equal the sum of the yearly salaries. This might be because of the bonus structure in the early years. I don't think it changes things much, though)

So going by this, if Parise retired in 2021 we'd be hit with a penalty of $3.86m for 5 years.

I've also seen references to a "max recapture period", but I'm not sure where that comes from. As I understand it the idea is that this is the max number of years that the net recapture penalty can be spread over. So if, say, the max recapture period is 2 years and Parise retires in 2021 with a net benefit of $19.3m, the cap hit would be ~$9.7m for 2 years. I'm not sure if this is really a thing, though.

Smart people, point out what's wrong here.

Cap benefit is kept as a running total of the difference between cumulative cap hit and salary paid. Max possible CRP is whatever the highest possible number we could be hit with. Max possible CRP period is the number of years we’d be hit with that max possible CRP if that’s what ended up happening. So his max possible CRP is 6.35ish roughly based on my post above, and that would require him to retire after 2022-23, which would be with two years left on his contract, making the max CRP 2 years.

But whenever he retires, the cap benefit at that point (again, kept as a running total) will be divided by the number of years he has left on his contract and count as dead cap for that duration.
 

Bazeek

Registered Lurker
Sponsor
Jul 26, 2011
17,883
11,253
Exiled in Madison
Cap benefit is kept as a running total of the difference between cumulative cap hit and salary paid. Max possible CRP is whatever the highest possible number we could be hit with. Max possible CRP period is the number of years we’d be hit with that max possible CRP if that’s what ended up happening. So his max possible CRP is 6.35ish roughly based on my post above, and that would require him to retire after 2022-23, which would be with two years left on his contract, making the max CRP 2 years.

But whenever he retires, the cap benefit at that point (again, kept as a running total) will be divided by the number of years he has left on his contract and count as dead cap for that duration.
I get the Cap Benefit being a running total (which is the Net Cap Benefit column in the table above), but I'm lost as to where the $6.35m comes from.
 

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
39,649
18,066
I get the Cap Benefit being a running total (which is the Net Cap Benefit column in the table above), but I'm lost as to where the $6.35m comes from.

The cap benefit after the 2022-23 season would be down to roughly 13M after a season or two of the cap hit being higher than the salary.

It’s 19.2M after this season

2020-21 he makes 8M but cap hit is 7.5, CB goes to 19.7.

2021-22 he makes 6M but cap hit is 7.5, CB goes down to 18.2.

2022-23 he makes 2M but cap hit is 7.5, CB goes down to 12.7.

If he retires here, 12.7 divided by the two years he has left is a 6.35M per season penalty for those two years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AJ Thelen
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad