DANOZ28
Registered User
im still laughing everyone wants to dump zucker who scores 20G plus per year but your willing to pay an unproven player as if they score 20G per year.
im still laughing everyone wants to dump zucker who scores 20G plus per year but your willing to pay an unproven player as if they score 20G per year.
There's definitely a whiff of Coyle Derangement Syndrome to it, but I think mostly people just realize which way the wind is blowing. Fenton traded Coyle, Nino and Granlund and apparently came within a hair's breadth of trading Zucker at the deadline. Not hard to see what's coming, for better or worse.im still laughing everyone wants to dump zucker who scores 20G plus per year but your willing to pay an unproven player as if they score 20G per year.
he should of been traded last off season at high value. he wont reach that again.i do understand fenton may trade zucker , what i don't understand is so many think we should. that's all carry on.
this year was zucker the goal scorer that we needed? he came back down to earth and should of been traded after his career year instead of being signed to a 5 year deal.i'll ask again don't we need goal scorers? even if we got high value do we really become a better team without him? the wild need to score more not less if we want to climb the standings. if we're rebuilding and trying to reach the basement well lets trade zucker ; dumba; spurgeon; parise & suter.
fenton signed zucker not fletcher, your view on value is probably just as biased as most on the returns he got so to each their own on that front. granlund was doing EVERYTHING he could to get zucker goals and zucker couldnt do anything with him. was it a down year because too much was expected of him or is he really not a 60 point winger?did fenton get full value / high value for any of his other trades? or are you saying fletcher should have traded zucker instead of signing his new contract? i believe other teams didn't see the wild as a threat this year and therefore could focus / key on defending against staal & zucker reducing their production. just my one cent. if coyle , nino, granlund , koivu, kunin , JEE , greenway were more of a threat staal & zucker could have scored more.
fenton signed zucker not fletcher, your view on value is probably just as biased as most on the returns he got so to each their own on that front. granlund was doing EVERYTHING he could to get zucker goals and zucker couldnt do anything with him. was it a down year because too much was expected of him or is he really not a 60 point winger?
I’d be willing to bet if we gave any of Kunin, Fiala or Donato the playing time and opportunities we gave Zucker this year, they could produce the 20 goals and 45 points Zucker put up. And they’d do it at probably half the price. I don’t want to just ship zucker off for nothing, but there’s only so many spots on a team. If he is taking away opportunity and being over-payed to do it, it doesn’t make any sense to not trade him if we found a reasonable deal.i'll ask again don't we need goal scorers? even if we got high value do we really become a better team without him? the wild need to score more not less if we want to climb the standings. if we're rebuilding and trying to reach the basement well lets trade zucker ; dumba; spurgeon; parise & suter.
i'll ask again don't we need goal scorers? even if we got high value do we really become a better team without him? the wild need to score more not less if we want to climb the standings. if we're rebuilding and trying to reach the basement well lets trade zucker ; dumba; spurgeon; parise & suter.
I'm with you, but I can't see Fenton trading away Donato or Fiala after just acquiring them, don't want them to trade Greenway because of his unique and necessary skills, and we all know that Parise can't be traded. I like Zucker more than most, even though I was disappointed in his season.i do understand fenton may trade zucker , what i don't understand is so many think we should. that's all carry on.
i agree he went downhill, but before dumbas injury i wouldnt say he was doing bad he had a lot of setups for zucker and staal.Except playing well, from Thanksgiving on.
i agree he went downhill, but before dumbas injury i wouldnt say he was doing bad he had a lot of setups for zucker and staal.
yup, dumba was the only one scoring off his passes.He was doing really good until Dumba's injury. Then he stopped.
yup, dumba was the only one scoring off his passes.
not making excuses for his lack of production, just saying noone else seemed to finish his passes off. the fact he would hardly ever shoot pissed me off plenty.And Dumba was the only one capable of setting Granlund up to score as well?
not making excuses for his lack of production, just saying noone else seemed to finish his passes off. the fact he would hardly ever shoot pissed me off plenty.
I think it would make sense to try and get long term deals done for Greenway and Fiala. Don't see why Donato would be interested in that kind of deal right now. Kunin makes me hesitant, and Ek shouldn't even be considered.