Lapa
Global Moderator
- Feb 21, 2010
- 13,154
- 2,067
Would help ticket sales while the Wild are in the tank...Hmmm a XXX trade thread. Does this mean the Wild are trading their ice girls for porn stars?
Someone like @Dr Jan Itor could probably give a lot of insight from his college days. I don't know how many of us watched too much of his play in the AHL. I wish I could give you hope, but I'm a little dumbfounded myself. Kloos was never going to be a top 6 center. Maybe a 3c? I'm not sure.I come in despair from the Ducks.
Who is Kloos and should we care?
Someone like @Dr Jan Itor could probably give a lot of insight from his college days. I don't know how many of us watched too much of his play in the AHL. I wish I could give you hope, but I'm a little dumbfounded myself. Kloos was never going to be a top 6 center. Maybe a 3c? I'm not sure.
Probably his upside isn't as high as Aberg's, but he's also probably the more responsible player, at the more important position (center). Klooz actually will try to bring his effort every game, as well. He lit up the college hockey scene, and this season, after a slow start, has lit up the AHL as well. Check out this game log. Late bloomer. Probably a mid or bottom 6 player in the NHL, if he sticks. If he doesn't stick, he's a top line AHLer.I come in despair from the Ducks.
Who is Kloos and should we care?
Good penalty killerProbably his upside isn't as high as Aberg's, but he's also probably the more responsible player, at the more important position (center). Klooz actually will try to bring his effort every game, as well. He lit up the college hockey scene, and this season, after a slow start, has lit up the AHL as well. Check out this game log. Late bloomer. Probably a mid or bottom 6 player in the NHL, if he sticks. If he doesn't stick, he's a top line AHLer.
The more I think about it, I should have just put "bottom six". I think his ceiling is 3rd line, small, two-way player.
Going with the idea of picking up guys on the cheap to fill holes, does anyone have thoughts on Beaulieu? Wants playing time, seems like he'd be a better option than Prosser or Murphy until Dumba comes back, and doesn't seem like he'd demand a lot in trade.
He's making $2.4m for another year after this one though, which isn't ideal. Buffalo fans seem happier with his play this year, but I haven't really seen him play myself.
Going with the idea of picking up guys on the cheap to fill holes, does anyone have thoughts on Beaulieu? Wants playing time, seems like he'd be a better option than Prosser or Murphy until Dumba comes back, and doesn't seem like he'd demand a lot in trade.
He's making $2.4m for another year after this one though, which isn't ideal. Buffalo fans seem happier with his play this year, but I haven't really seen him play myself.
Yeah, you don't want to be spending 2.4M on third pairing dman if you can help it.
Cap space for this season doesn't worry me too much. I don't think we're looking at adding anyone significant at the deadline, though I guess there's an opportunity cost there if we were.Yeah, you don't want to be spending 2.4M on third pairing dman if you can help it.
Cap space for this season doesn't worry me too much. I don't think we're looking at adding anyone significant at the deadline, though I guess there's an opportunity cost there if we were.
For next season yeah, even if he worked out it wouldn't make sense to carry both him and Pateryn, and Pateryn's probably a better fit for the 3rd pairing. So you'd have to count on being able to trade Beaulieu over the summer.
If he's not much of an upgrade over Prosser/Murphy though I don't see a point in it. Was just a thought.
I think Brodin being able to play both sides more or less mitigates that. Just depends on if you'd rather have Seeler or Beaulieu on the 2nd pairing. Or Pateryn on the 2nd pairing and Beaulieu on his off side on the 3rd pairing with Seeler.He's also is a LHS d-man.
I think Brodin being able to play both sides more or less mitigates that. Just depends on if you'd rather have Seeler or Beaulieu on the 2nd pairing. Or Pateryn on the 2nd pairing and Beaulieu on his off side on the 3rd pairing with Seeler.
But again, we get back to whether or not any of that's an improvement over what we've got. Pateryn on the second pairing annoys me, but Beaulieu might well annoy me more if he's still pretty braindead defensively.
Is this sarcasm? Pateryn is making only slightly less at $2.25m.
I'm on record as saying that it was an ill considered signing, but why double down on a LHD, who was let go by a team desperate for LHD(MTL), let alone a Francophone LHD?Is this sarcasm? Pateryn is making only slightly less at $2.25m.