lol good job treliving this will really bring us closer to a cup.
really starting to doubt my faith in him.
really starting to doubt my faith in him.
lol good job treliving this will really bring us closer to a cup.
really starting to doubt my faith in him.
What do you suggest we do? Trade Andersson, a first and something else for Nash?lol good job treliving this will really bring us closer to a cup.
really starting to doubt my faith in him.
lol good job treliving this will really bring us closer to a cup.
really starting to doubt my faith in him.
I like the pick ups today, like everyone has said is that both are depth moves and I hope they fire both stajan and brower into the sun. A younger and faster 4th line will help and put pk will be better with shore on it.
Here's a thought.
Hammer was moved for a 1st + 2x 2nds.
He had 3 years on his term at a cap hit of 3.8.
McD is a better player, I'm not even going to debate that. But if we say JT/Namestnikov is a wash:
2x 1st, 2 top prospects for 100 games of McD.
Hell, Tatar (middle 6 scorer) 1st, 2nd, 3rd.
I know some people have **** on this move before, but when you break it down, Tre got long term value on that Hamonic trade.
I know some people have **** on this move before, but when you break it down, Tre got long term value on that Hamonic trade.
Na, wasn't interested in Nash. Would have been nice to use some of our D prospects to upgrade the wings. I'm sorry but Shore and Stewart are terrible.What do you suggest we do? Trade Andersson, a first and something else for Nash?
Yea, no thanks. Our window may be open, but that doesn’t mean we need to throw all our eggs in 1 basket to **** us in the future.
Na, wasn't interested in Nash. Would have been nice to use some of our D prospects to upgrade the wings. I'm sorry but Shore and Stewart are terrible.
We need to stop overrating our prospects so damn much, this forum is embarrassing.
Who would you suggest we look at trading one of our overrated D prospects for then? If they’re overrated we’d likely have to trade a few of them for a decent winger (or a further combination of picks+roster players).Na, wasn't interested in Nash. Would have been nice to use some of our D prospects to upgrade the wings. I'm sorry but Shore and Stewart are terrible.
We need to stop overrating our prospects so damn much, this forum is embarrassing.
Kane didn’t even cost that much, 1st and a 4th. That’s roughly the equivalent to Fox and someone like a Poirier. We should have wheeled, I agree with Kanye.
Kane didn’t even cost that much, 1st and a 4th. That’s roughly the equivalent to Fox and someone like a Poirier. We should have wheeled, I agree with Kanye.
The fact that Treliving wouldn't move any of his good prospects for quick "fixes" suggests this board isn't overrating anything.
Kane didn’t even cost that much, 1st and a 4th. That’s roughly the equivalent to Fox and someone like a Poirier. We should have wheeled, I agree with Kanye.
We dont know that...maybe he offered and nobody wanted them
The two guys we got are much better than Kane.
Well I am glad no one wanted. I hope that's the case.We dont know that...maybe he offered and nobody wanted them