Then why make the Roy trade?!
This is getting circular...
Then why make the Roy trade?!
This is getting circular...
maybe somebody just licked too many envelopes ala Susan of Seinfeld....
This ******** about being "all-in" is annoying.
Go listen to the actual 1040 interview rather than paraphrasing on the forum.
Gilman clearly qualified his statement, "Well, if what you mean by all-in is...etc etc"
He only agreed to say that they were "all-in" because he knew that it was jargon borrowed from a different game that has no specific meaning in this context!
Which is why he felt free to say it.
Because it means nothing.
Fire Gillis right now, that is the reason why we fired Nonis a couple of years ago, isn't it?
It's his refusal to fire AV that is going to cost us the cup, not the player, but because our terrible coaching.
It's his refusal to trade for anyone in the 09 trade deadline when we have Sundin.
It's his refusal to hire Guy Boucher when given the chance, and continue to make the right move.
It's his decision to support AV when we lost to the LA Kings who barely made the playoffs.
Fire Gillis, but most importantly fired AV!
I guess thats the only thing Gillis could have said. I don't think he was happy about that question though. It makes him look pretty bad when his player says that.
I hate Gillis... hate him. Arrogant... jus arrogant for a guy that inherited a team with the Sedins, Kesler, etc.
Based on our lack of good players?