I don’t mind Stetcher as bottom pairing dman but just like Biega, I don’t value him as highly as some other posters here do. He’s a tweener type, I don’t want him out there against the other team’s top players and he doesn’t produce much offense either. He’s a solid depth dman. I’ve liked Fatenberg’s play just as much if not more.
Even Gillis said that you need size and speed to win in the NHL today. I remember reading that Yzerman preferred to target taller dmen in Tampa since their analytical data showed that taller dmen were more effective(I assume it was more in depth than corsi). I just don’t love the idea of having an undersized dman who isn’t dynamic offensively or a shutdown type like Jared Spurgeon. That being said, this Barrie pursuit by the Canucks is pretty stupid lol, especially if the cost to acquire him is high.
Benning is in full blown panic mode, he needs the playoffs to save his job and Aquilini seems to have given him the green light to mortgage the future outside of Pod/Hoglander. Other GM’s likely sense this and are probably going to hold him hostage with high asking prices, they can then get him to overpay or use Benning as leverage to get another team to overpay.
TLDR:
- I like Stecher as a bottom pairing dman but I sense some Biega-like overrating
- Gillis and Yzerman have mentioned that size/speed wins and having a depth dman who’s undersized and isn’t a shutdown dman or point producer is probably not a key piece or a huge loss
- Barrie trade doesn’t make sense
- Benning will have to overpay if he wants to buy