Cause it’s not us.
We’ve used retention both to move guys and to acquire guys.
We won a cup with a team over the cap in LTIR, went back to the finals with a team using LTIR.
We built a “go for it” team based on deferring a large chunk of Iginla’s cap hit to the following year.
We placed David Krejci on LTIR and then used the money to acquire a forward knowing Krejci would be ready for playoffs if we made it.
I don’t recall many being upset about those things. Believe all teams operate under the same CBA too but I will work to confirm this.
I really don't care either way, it's really within the rules. Just seems kinda silly doing these transactional gymnastics to legally circumvent a cap which the league insists it's trying to protect.
Whatever they do, a team will exploit it. It's a flawed system, which I don't know a better option to replace it, so it is what it is.
Like I said, I have no problem with any teams using it, just kinda laughable when the league cries cap circumvention on one thing but not another. They've punished teams for other things that "break the spirit of the salary cap" or some other wordage like that. Just amusing, that's all.