The Preds got Filip Forsberg for Martin Erat. You have to imagine Val Filppula could have gotten a similar or better return given his age. I agree completely on White, he's clearly the odd man out and Holland doesn't trade him?
Think about it:
Kindl and Hudler for Zach Bogosian
A 1st plus a couple prospects for Jay Bouwmeester
Filppula for Filip Forsberg
A 2nd or 3rd for Kyle Quincey
A 3rd or 4th in a deep draft for White
A 4th of 5th for one of Cleary, Miller, Eaves
I'm sorry but in what world does Filppula hold this value? Had he been playing well up to the trade deadline and was looking like he really did break out last sure he could have got that but he's no that friggin' good. You're either undervaluing Erat's value or overrating Filppula, either way it was an overpayment by McPhee imo.
I'm not a fan of Jbo, he's played okay in the games I've watched of him in Calgary but he seemed extremely soft. After giving up the 1st last year I'm fine holding on to it this year.
While we are rebuilding, not getting a 3rd/4th/5th regardless of the draft strength is a bit of a silly reason to call Holland a bad GM. I some of us wanted the dead weight moved but maybe Holland and Co. felt that Miller is worth more to us then someone they have ranked in the 4th round is, or nobody was offering/calling about those players. If we want to move them what makes them so attractive to other teams?Sometimes having that extra depth on your team is worth more then having an extra late round pick.
And not everyone is perfect. We all have 20/20 hindsight at this point but the Kindl+Hudler for Bogo had more to it, though he's doing well for himself now we don't know how he'd have responded to being traded. Atlanta had offers of 2 1sts+2nd for him so that means Hudler+Kindl/Ericsson+Pick was equal to Bogosian in their eyes. At the time Bogo was being out produced by Ericsson, just imagine if Bogosian didn't develop with us where our defence would be right now, adding a top 6 forward+1st seemed a little rich at the time as well, I think we'd have gotten at least a 1st+ for Hudler had we decided to shop him at the time even with his down year.
I think when it comes down to it the felt that the risk out weighed the reward, we were in a playoff push at this point, and the fellt that Hudler would be more of an impact player for them. The last thing I'd like to say is while Bogosian does have age on his side right now he is a #3 dman, Ericsson is also a #3 dman, Hudler, while he is on Calgary now, is a 50-60 point forward and that first became Jurco & Ouellet.
While originally it seemed lopsided in our favor I'm not sure it's that much of a steal anymore. Though I also think that Bogosian never reaches his full potential because his offense doesn't come through. Also at the time there was generally a lot of people who felt that Bogosian would never meet his potential and was a total bust, he's proving them wrong but there was some uncertainty.
I guess my point is that we can't truely judge the impact doing a trade or not doing a trade does until years after the fact, even know it's probably still to early.