Who gives a crap.
Should the wings have traded Yzerman or Lidstrom?
There's value to keeping a true Flame like Iginla or true Wings like Datsyuk.
Loyalty to your players? Or loyalty to your fans?
IMO, the idea of lifelong Red Wings is still appealing to many Wings fans.
Yzerman. Lidstrom. Draper and Maltby (for the most part). Zetterberg. Datsyuk. Kronwall.
These guys should be life-long Wings.
Who gives a crap.
Should the wings have traded Yzerman or Lidstrom?
There's value to keeping a true Flame like Iginla or true Wings like Datsyuk.
Meh, this is a business and loyalty doesn't buy you what it used to 20 years ago.
Of course not, because every year with them we were on a playoff hunt.
If there's 15 games left of the season at the trade deadline, and we are out of the playoff race (season 2013-14), and we know Pavel moves after season back to Russia, are those 15 games, maybe a month playing with the youngsters the difference? Really worth of not trading him?
people in this thread suggesting that we honestly trade Datsyuk.
Penguins are always interested in wingers. What would you want for him, or is this one of those ones where I haven't seen him a lot lately and little do I know he's completely shot?
Yeah, I wouldn't be opposed to someone like Despres+ either if it appeared that he was able to play the shutdown role well but then you guys don't really have a reason to trade him then as he could replace Orpik.
We get blown out in one game and the solution is we should trade our best player?
You people are losing your mind...
Trade Datsyuk for what? Prospects we can bury?
As an outsider that was sort of my initial reaction too. He's only 35... plenty of gas in the tank.
Watch the game again and specifically watch him.
If D is what you'd be looking to trade for, and the Penguins were the target, you'd have to take Martin's $5M hit as part of the deal, and possibly using the new CBA arrangements, you'd even have to continue to absorb some of Datsyuk's hit. Not like he'll be cheap when he signs his final contract. Despres would likely be available as part of that (as much as he is part of our immediate future in building the D), for a player of Datsyuk's caliber.
I think maybe the only D prospects of ours you wouldn't have a shot at, are Morrow and Pouliot. So Despres, Maatta, Harrington all possibilities. Harrington strikes me as a Red Wings type player based on what I know of him, but mgmt is extremely high on the kid so don't know if he'd be available or not. Doubt Morrow or Pouliot would be available to any team...
Martin's an upgrade and a top 4 guy, given who you have out there now, but he's $5M/yr as noted. Letang is going to get a big raise so even with this setup I'm not sure Dats' salary would fit the Penguins' plan.
Also I don't know what kind of workout regimen he's on but looking at guys like Jagr and Whitney, why wouldn't Dats be able to be VERY productive for another 4 years at least? I don't know... if you guys were thinking rebuild I'd be thinking who better for a stud F prospect to learn from than Pavel Datsyuk? I always pictured him retiring a Red Wing but what do I know?
That said I would have no problems at all fielding this lineup in the playoffs:
Dats - Sid - Dupuis
Kunitz - Geno - Neal
Cooke - Sutter - TK
Send him over ASAP!
Smith looked like a 20-year-old rookie.
Problem is, he's 24 in two weeks.
This Red Wings team is not a contender, and the problems are so widespread and so fundamental that the Wings will not become a contender without being rebuilt. The sooner the Wings face the music and recognize that brutal fact, the better.
Smith looked like a 20-year-old rookie.
Problem is, he's 24 in two weeks.
Last night's game was very ugly. If this continues for 1.5 months, and we are 15th, BELOW CLB, and already elimanated from the playoffs... we will see how i feel about this subject area then.
Doesn't the new CBA pretty much crap all over this idea anyway? I thought it was toxic to trade lifetime contracts (Franzen, Zetterberg, Datsyuk) now because the Wings would still have to take a cap hit or something along those lines at the end of the deal, effectively handcuffing them at an unknown point in the future if a player retires (or not) before the contract ends.
I'm not going to profess to know all the ins and outs of this though.
Datsyuk doesn't have one of those, so you're really off base with that as your reasoning.