The facts cannot be quantified, so it's hard to put them on a message board.
Not everything can be 100% factual, but people could make arguments that contain actual examples or evidence rather than completely baseless assertions.
For instance, SouthernHab made the assertion in a previous thread that Parros playing against Boston stopped Milan Lucic throwing any cheapshots because he was 'scared that Parros' would jump him and beat him up. I refuted this by (a) pointing out Lucic's long fightcard against legitimate heavyweights and stating that it's quite unlikely that Parros gives him sleepless nights and (b) pointing out that Parros is not that kind of enforcer and challenging SouthernHab to give just one example of Parros doing something like that in his long nhl career. Following which SouthernHab slunk away, but yet here he is again in this thread repeating the same claim and still without any evidence of any kind at all.
sandysan made the claim just now that having Parros on the roster makes Prust a better player. Clearly this is an opinion, but I think most people's opinions would be that Prust was significantly worse last season than the season before (and that this was completely unrelated to Parros). Sandysan could try to find some evidence that Prust is better when an enforcer is on the roster. But, for instance, if you look at Prust's career season with the Rangers. They signed Derek Boogard to be an enforcer that season, but Boogard tragically only played 22 games for the Rangers and none after the start of December. Of Prust's 29 points that season, only 6 came in games where Boogard was dressed. If anything the actual empirical evidence is more in favour of Prust historically playing better when the responsibility
is on him to do the enforcing/protecting/whatever you want to call it.
You made the claim just upthread that having Parros 'calmed down the cheapshots'. This should be an easy thing to back up with at least some kind of evidence (if not 100% fact because, again, we're depending somewhat on subjectives). If teams with enforcers get cheapshotted less than teams without, there should be an observable trend that you can show over a number of seasons showing that to be the case. Any reason why no-one has ever done that?