TheWayToRefJose
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2017
- 3,478
- 3,164
If he extended, I'd do that, but not for a rental.Meier, Norris, 1st and Sorensen. Minimum.
If he extended, I'd do that, but not for a rental.Meier, Norris, 1st and Sorensen. Minimum.
He wants to be in LA it would be extended.
Not at the price we will ask... not asking futures rental package. It will be a trade for extended or he walks likely its not worth it to us for a rental price.as a rental they can easily afford him
Its not really he wants out yet just unsure if he wants to stay here BUT you seem to have the best grasp from the TOR side Ive seen so far.I think there is a real chance Panarin gets dealt. If he is saying he wont negotiate during the season, and has already indicated he would rather be elsewhere, they have to move him.
I'm assuming the blue jackets arent interested in futures. I think they would want someone that can play now.
Nylander would be a good fit
Leafs: Panarin (He would need to agree to a extension at 8-9 per beforehand)
Jackets: Nylander, 1st rd pick
Why leafs do it: They get a ppg guy to play with Matthews. Hyman can be moved back to his natural RW position or Brown/Kap can be promoted from the 4th line. They likely add only 1.5-2.5 in salary from what Nylander would have made on a long term deal. They may have to move the last year of Marleaus deal (6.25 cap, only 1.25 salary) to fit marner/matthews but if he nets 27g again it shouldnt be hard
Why Jackets do it. They get a 22 year old who has started with back to back 61pt seasons. Last year 49pts at ES were more than any forward not named Panarin had in TOTAL. Jackets can give Nylander a true shot at C. Losing the bread man hurts, but going from Saad a year ago to a guy who is already better in Nylander isn't exactly terrible
as a rental they can easily afford him
Meier, Norris, 1st and Sorensen. Minimum.
Who says they wouldn't add a RD as well? You add more firepower because if you can continue adding skill, you absolutely do it.Honestly why would Leafs add more fire power?? Does he think they are going to out score everyone 10-5?? They need RHD nothing else really.
No they can't, really. Not without giving up a good roster player like Kadri and a pick. Rental or not, the guy is 26 and has pretty much had three 30-goal, 75+ point seasons in a row. You do NOT get a player like that, for scraps.
Leafs would be dumb to do it. IE: They can't afford it.
Understandable. Some of or fans have looked at yout ELCs just because Cali was mentioned as a destination he might like but its possible money situations and players just dont fit. Maybe you get lucky to move cash and he signs there.next year anyways. LA would be one of the places Id rather see him go.The problem is he will want 8-9m Avg. The Kings would need to clear a lot of cap space to fit him. Making the ELC even more important. Thus, making it a bad mistake to move Vilardi.
The only way I can see a deal being made between LA and Columbus...is if it is a 3-way trade then maybe. But LA doesnt have the movable assets that Columbus fans would want.
Like Hainsey?Leafs fans keep saying this, but the Pens have always had some solid but unheralded defensemen when they won their Cups
Understandable. Some of or fans have looked at yout ELCs just because Cali was mentioned as a destination he might like but its possible money situations and players just dont fit. Maybe you get lucky to move cash and he signs there.next year anyways. LA would be one of the places Id rather see him go.
Why not add more firepower? The goal of hockey is to outscore the opposition, and I don't think there's any natural law that says you have to have a particular mix of players in order to do so successfully. Adding Panarin to the Leafs would give them hilariously good forward depth.Honestly why would Leafs add more fire power?? Does he think they are going to out score everyone 10-5?? They need RHD nothing else really.
What does that have to do with anything? They had focused on forwards for so long that they were desperate for a defenseman and everyone knew it and lost a trade badly because of that and Chiarelli's general incompetence.yeah moving Hall for Larsson to upgrade their defense was the smartest move Edmonton has ever made
Succeeding at it? Since when are first round exits succeeding? It's sad if finishing in the top half of the league is your definition of success.But actually succeeding at it
A 4th liner, a 3rd pairing dman and a likely late 2nd rounder?Leivo +Carrick+ 2nd
And call it a day.
why would they be letting in 5 goals per game? They let in 2.8 last year with a worse roster. Let the other team worry about playing defenseHonestly why would Leafs add more fire power?? Does he think they are going to out score everyone 10-5?? They need RHD nothing else really.
Better than letting him walk, no?Will Cbj trade him as a rental, though?..
Honestly why would Leafs add more fire power?? Does he think they are going to out score everyone 10-5?? They need RHD nothing else really.