It's basically nickels more than max ELC money...can a guy like Engvall really be overpaid at 1.25?
They will be moving at least 1 of Kap/AJ/Kerfoot will be moved, Engvall is here to stay.The question is...given that the Leaf are cap-strapped, can they get the same level of performance if they go to the bargain bin of UFAs at $700k like they did this year.
The fact that the Marlies play down the road, they practice down the hall, and that Toronto's lineup has superstars up top makes for a very desirable destination for these borderline UFAs.
Engvall at $1.25m is going to impact the cap even if he doesn't make next year's team
Likely so...I'm just not necessarily convinced that after 30 or so NHL games, he's "worth" committing real cap dollars to.They will be moving at least 1 of Kap/AJ/Kerfoot will be moved, Engvall is here to stay.
Oh **** right off with that ish.
One can only hope. So overrated. Overpaid by 1.5-2 mil a year. We need that cap space.Wonder if AJ gets moved..
Likely so...I'm just not necessarily convinced that after 30 or so NHL games, he's "worth" committing real cap dollars to.
At the end of the day, the downside obviously isn't huge, it just limits some of the flexibility the Leafs may want up front.
I also question, if this wasn't the Leafs, would he be thrilled to get an $900k one-way deal?
I'm sure the third line Nylander is supposed to be Kapanen.nylander on both the 2nd and 3rd lines? can't even ice a full line up, sheesh the cap is bad in toronto
Kerfoot replacement
Hyman - Matthews - Marner
Mikheyev - Tavares - Nylander
Korshkov - Engvall - Nylander
Agostino - Spezza - GOAT
I'm sure your opinion is "worth" about zero cents on the topic. I fail to see how having a young, fast, skilled player signed to a cheap deal limits any flexibility for the Leafs. If anything this improves flexibility because he makes less than other Leaf forwards but contributes just as much, meaning he could replace one of the more expensive players to clear up cap space or he could easily be flipped for a pick.Likely so...I'm just not necessarily convinced that after 30 or so NHL games, he's "worth" committing real cap dollars to.
At the end of the day, the downside obviously isn't huge, it just limits some of the flexibility the Leafs may want up front.
I also question, if this wasn't the Leafs, would he be thrilled to get an $900k one-way deal?
Would any fanbase not like this contract? Hes been a pro for years and has continually gotten better. I'm much more scared of what he could demand when this contract expires. I wouldn't be shocked if he was a 60 point player in a few years.I also question, if this wasn't the Leafs, would he be thrilled to get an $900k one-way deal?
Spezza has been excellent. Why wouldn't you want him back?Spezza will not be back, he's too slow. Also you have Nylander on both lines and no AJ or Kapanen.
Guy has played 35 games, sure he has had a great start but he has cooled off considerably. Hey I like him too but we have already overpaid on three other stars (Matthews, Marner and Nylander) and it’s not like we have a ton of cap space. 250K here and there could be huge.
Your response is like I just insulted your mom or kicked your puppy. Just being realistic is all.
? why would he take less than his current salary?
I'm sure your opinion is "worth" about zero cents on the topic. I fail to see how having a young, fast, skilled player signed to a cheap deal limits any flexibility for the Leafs. If anything this improves flexibility because he makes less than other Leaf forwards but contributes just as much, meaning he could replace one of the more expensive players to clear up cap space or he could easily be flipped for a pick.
Would any fanbase not like this contract? Hes been a pro for years and has continually gotten better. I'm much more scared of what he could demand when this contract expires. I wouldn't be shocked if he was a 60 point player in a few years.
Spezza has done everything asked of him, and more.Spezza will not be back, he's too slow. Also you have Nylander on both lines and no AJ or Kapanen.
Because he's currently on a two-way deal where if he ends up in the AHL, he makes a fraction of it.
It's $500k more than a replacement level player, and $300k more than the cap exemption if he gets sent down.
Unless the cap rises dramatically this offseason, the Leafs are going to have to go into next year in a similar precarious cap position as this one. Having Engvall at $1.25m means you're going to have to budget for him to be there regardless of how he plays, and takes away $300-$500k that could be spent on more known commodities.
In isolation, there's nothing wrong with the contract... it's in relation to what the Leafs cap constraints are, and the fact that there may be a situation next year where he gets outperformed by bargain bin UFAs.
Seconded.Spezza has done everything asked of him, and more.
I hope they bring him back.
Because he's currently on a two-way deal where if he ends up in the AHL, he makes a fraction of it.
It's $500k more than a replacement level player, and $300k more than the cap exemption if he gets sent down.
Unless the cap rises dramatically this offseason, the Leafs are going to have to go into next year in a similar precarious cap position as this one. Having Engvall at $1.25m means you're going to have to budget for him to be there regardless of how he plays, and takes away $300-$500k that could be spent on more known commodities.
In isolation, there's nothing wrong with the contract... it's in relation to what the Leafs cap constraints are, and the fact that there may be a situation next year where he gets outperformed by bargain bin UFAs.
In isolation, there's nothing wrong with the contract... it's in relation to what the Leafs cap constraints are, and the fact that there may be a situation next year where he gets outperformed by bargain bin UFAs.