CorgisPer60
Barking at the net
Id be happy to see OT at this point
This. OT is good as far as B2Bs are concerned.
Id be happy to see OT at this point
Jets, I just wanted to tell you: Good luck. We're all counting on you.
Jets, I just wanted to tell you: Good luck. We're all counting on you.
Pavs save % is at 93.3% for the game after that goal. Considering that's the only soft one he's given up and has otherwise played well, he gets a pass from me. I'm more puzzled why Chiarot couldn't box him out.
Jets, I just wanted to tell you: Good luck. We're all counting on you.
You know: it is possible to like Pav's game tonight (which I do), to praise him for his play (which I have), and yet still call that last goal a soft goal (which it was - short side: should not have been possible to score from there).
There are shades of grey.
Jets, I just wanted to tell you: Good luck. We're all counting on you.
Jets, I just wanted to tell you: Good luck. We're all counting on you.
This. OT is good as far as B2Bs are concerned.
That's got to be demoralizing for the rest of the team to have a goalie let in soft goals when it counts the most. Night after night after night...
Wish they could trade Pavs for a bag of pucks or something.
I've heard of people using small sample sizes before but that's ridiculous