Hey, if it's posturing because he likes Eichel, wow that gives us something to think about.
By that, I mean just one team....Toronto.
Can you imagine having the right to pick McDavid, and Toronto somehow ends up at 3, which is possible.
Murray to TO; "we will trade out of #1 but won't go past #2." You could totally fleece TO. McDavid in hockey mad TO, his hometown would be a match made in heaven.
What could we get from TO, and don't forget they'd have to trade with AZ to get to #2.
So they trade with AZ, have #2.....
Murray to TO....."we want #2 (Eichel), Nylander and Gardiner?" or "#2, Nylander and Van Rem" yeah, that could work.....You want McDavid, we want Eichel, Nylander and Van Riemsdyk.
Two years:
Kane - Reinhart - Van Riemsdyk
Ennis - Eichel - Nylander
Moulson - Girgensons - ??? (Fasching)
Des - Larsson - Foligno
That leaves Grigs, Hodgson, Gionta, NYI #1 and all the other prospects to trade for another couple spots. And in 2 years, it would be possible for Fasching to fill that 3rd line RW ????...(I'll edit that now)
Yeah, if a Cup winner is what we want (which is what we want), leveraging McDavid could set us up right. TO is the perfect fleece.