Hockey 4 Life
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2012
- 6,078
- 3,115
Lol thats terrible. Jones and vlasic are negative value.How about Meier for Nylander. Sharks throw in Jones at 50% and Vlasic?
Lol thats terrible. Jones and vlasic are negative value.How about Meier for Nylander. Sharks throw in Jones at 50% and Vlasic?
How about Meier for Nylander. Sharks throw in Jones at 50% and Vlasic?
Is it terrible to Dubas?Lol thats terrible. Jones and vlasic are negative value.
Of course it is. Jones and vlasic are terrible.Is it terrible to Dubas?
In his final year if he is very likely not playing to the tune of a 10 million dollar player, no team is going to give him that, not just the Sharks or Leafs. You would just not qualify him, which makes him UFA and sign him for less, or reach an agreement with him for less before any QO needs to be made. Most players and agents know within a decent range what they may or may not get in a deal, so if he is nowhere near his $10 million QO in value, he won't have any team over the barrel so to speak in negotiations.
That said, this particular trade seems like a very sideways/unnecessary deal. Similar players, production and cap hit, so not sure why either team does this trade, when they both like their current guy.
Totally agree no idea why everyone freaks out about his QO when it’s super unlikely to play any sort of role in his next contract.
Well it will, cause if you do not QO him, you'll be fighting with 31 other teams to sign him after.
Meier has all the leverage here
Oh totally, but if Meier think he's worth 8 x8, or 9 x 8, and your gm offers him 6 × 7, he doesn't NEED to sign like the othera RFA, cause you can't qualify him at 10M.Supply and demand? Never heard of it.
Is it terrible to Dubas?
This. If the solution to him not being worth 10m is to make him a UFA... that is going to effect his trade value.Oh totally, but if Meier think he's worth 8 x8, or 9 x 8, and your gm offers him 6 × 7, he doesn't NEED to sign like the othera RFA, cause you can't qualify him at 10M.