Seanaconda
Registered User
- May 6, 2016
- 9,596
- 3,341
So is it about getting every call right or is about egregious calls right (like you original post suggested). If it's about every call then why shouldn't penalties or icing that lead to goals be reviewable? Some penalties (delay of game, TMM, or high-sticking) are "zero-discretion" so why should offsides be reviewable but no those penalties or icing?
They probably should. Just keep it to one review / timeout a game if you get it wrong. Well the icings. And goaltender interference is reviewable but alot of penalties are crazy subjective considering they only call them when they feel like it