Jackothy
Registered User
- Jun 10, 2009
- 2,082
- 93
The biggest question is what is more important, building himself up, or building the team up? Personally I am a fan of the Toronto Maple Leafs, not the Toronto Tim Leiwekes. So I will gladly support him in trying to better the team, not matter how much he has earned the right to make a change.
And like I said before, he has earned the right to do everything within the Presidents powers. He can make any and all moves as of day 1, that's part of his job. If he sat on his hands and told Bell and Rogers he was waiting to build himself up before making changes (also please explain how you can build yourself up without doing your job? Great speeches? Handing out candy? Wearing a great suit?), he would be canned before you can say "Hanging on to history is for losers".
Ahhh, finally you say something worthwhile.
Fair point, and yes he is well within the rights of his job...I've never debated that. I also already gave you an example of how to build himself up, by moving forward with his idea about getting people in their seats. This is where I differ in opinion.
He's three weeks into a job and trying to act (or rather perhaps being portrayed as) the be-all and end-all of the Toronto Maple Leafs. What I'm saying is why should I respect him three weeks in? I don't and I don't like the approach he is taking. Is he going to care what I think of him? I sincerely doubt it. When asked if I like this guy, should I lie? Not happening. So I don't really see what the issue is here. I don't like it, you do.
I don't think this particular idea is going to make a difference and it's like he's trying to prove he's in charge. Don't dig it three weeks in, just seems tacky.