SimpleJack
Registered User
- Jul 25, 2013
- 6,493
- 4,163
I don’t know why you are being so intentionally thick. I said he had wet dreams regarding the 09 run, which is way better than what Kane ever did. Not that their whole playoff careers are a big gap. Don’t twist my words. Stop citing face off percentage and more overtime goals as these strong arguments that I’m supposed to be like well okay you got me there. I can say Malkin has more goals in the finals , he has more points in the third and fourth rounds, a better ppg in the late rounds and he has more even strength assists and points while playing with much lesser talent. Kane’s pp was arguably just as good as the one Malkin played on. Now I’ll start bring up these points every time and say “but how can you ignore these???” Like you are doing.l with the even strength goals. What gets me is you arguing with yourself which makes this super entertaining for me. I never even said there was much a of a difference and you keep trying to hammer home that it’s not a much of a difference and I’m just sitting here like what the hell are you talking about I already know that. Learn some hockey and come back to me , thanks my dude. EDIT: and yes 1.04 and .97 is a large gap when it comes to ppg.
Im done here. Not wasting my time with someone that doesn’t know the definition of the words “much” and “large”...and who thinks FO% and overtime goals aren’t important...and says one player has more even strength points(while leaving out that he’s played in 35 more games)....and is gonna tell me I’m the one who doesn’t know hockey when he’s apparently unaware of how bad the Hawks PP was compared to those Penguins teams.