Wow, that video about Bruins management makes some of the guys look bad.
Trade Seguin because he doesn't fit with the Bruins 'culture'...
I think guys like Chara and Lucic take too much place in that dressing room.
Without excusing a bad trade too much, I think it gives interesting insight into building a Cup contender. I think most fans would assemble the most guys who score a lot of points, which would be a Cup winner
on paper but maybe not on the ice.
Even in that video, one of their guys acknowledges Seguin will be a star. So maybe they didn't think he'd be this good, but they knew he'd be good. And they sacrificed a good player to try to build whatever team they thought was necessary to win a Cup. Time will tell if it was the smart move or not.
Compare it to the Joe Thornton trade. On paper, the Bruins unquestionably lost that trade. On the ice, well, as a direct or indirect result of the trade, they won a Cup. Would they have won that Cup with Thornton? Maybe, maybe not.
If Seguin racks up Art Rosses and Richard trophies in Dallas but never gets a Cup...but Boston manages to put together a team that wins another Cup in the meantime...do they still lose the trade? On paper, sure, but I think that's a trade they're happy to lose.
Anyway not saying Boston or Chiarelli are right in moving Seguin (it certainly doesn't look like a good idea now)...just saying that I think there's more to winning a Cup than stockpiling guys who can put up points. Or at least, that's what GMs think. Doesn't stop them from doing stuff that looks stupid to us though.