TheMadHatTrick
Registered User
- Nov 2, 2008
- 6,731
- 2,802
Well to be fair depth does win...provided that's depth of talent, and not just depth of bodies.
there is depth of talent. I see multiple waves of talent on the horizon over the next couple of years and beyond.Well to be fair depth does win...provided that's depth of talent, and not just depth of bodies.
Pearson, Pardinho, and maybe Kloffenstein. Stroman and Sanchez returning to previous form would obviously help immensely. Borucki, SRF, Zeuch, etc should help fill out the middle/back end of the rotation.name the ones with a real chance of being impact mlb starters.
Vladimir Guerrero Jrname the ones with a real chance of being impact mlb starters.
name the ones with a real chance of being impact mlb starters.
there is depth of talent. I see multiple waves of talent on the horizon over the next couple of years and beyond.
That's not the argument. The argument is whether the acquired pieces fall into that subgroup. We didn't trade for Groshans, and Kevin Smith, and Nate Pearson if that's the depth you're referring to.
You realize that the majority of the Cleveland playoff core was built off of supposedly "fringe" acquisitions that actually turned out to be great scouting decisions, right?
To be fair, the latter was acquired with the EE compensation pick so you could make that argument.
Wait, what? I'm not arguing whether they acquired them. I'm talking strictly about trades. We've been great in the draft since Parker was fired. Only pick I haven't liked was Warmoth. It's Atkins trading acumen and his ability to negotiate that hasn't inspired me with confidence yet, but it's not a large sample so we'll see going forward.
You realize that the majority of the Cleveland playoff core was built off of supposedly "fringe" acquisitions that actually turned out to be great scouting decisions, right? Billy McKinney has been worth nearly twice as many wins as Happ since being acquired, and he was the "guy who couldn't hit AAA pitching" that no one wanted in that deal LOL.
"Having a chance of being impact starters" is a throwaway comment. Neither Bautista nor Encarnacion had much chance, until one day they were. Donaldson actually falls in the same category as well, being a failed catching prospect who didn't establish anything until he was 26/27.
high impact prospects are being guarded more than ever right now. The success of guys like Torres, Soto, Acuna, etc has pretty much killed the notion that talented 17/18 year olds in low A ball are 4 or 5 years away from contributing and thus tradable inventory. Throw in the success over the past while of teams building around young controllable players and it only makes things more difficult because everyone is trying to do the same thing.That's not the argument. The argument is whether the acquired pieces fall into that subgroup. We didn't trade for Groshans, and Kevin Smith, and Nate Pearson if that's the depth you're referring to.
Atkins and Shapiro are as phoney as a $2bill at least I could trust AA as he was much more honest.
Wait, what? My bad, I'm not arguing whether they acquired them. I'm talking strictly about trades. We've been great in the draft since Parker was fired. Only pick I haven't liked was Warmoth. It's Atkins trading acumen and his ability to negotiate that hasn't inspired me with confidence yet, but it's not a large sample so we'll see going forward.
.
Unless you have a young controllable asset it's becoming nearly impossible to nab high upside tools in a deal. Best you can hope for is to find some solid prospects that might pop with a few adjustments and some luck.
I don't know how they have given that impression. These two get so much heat but in reality if you compare Toronto's talent replenishing with two other recently competitive teams who are now rebuilding, I think we're in very good hands.
Vladdy was signed in AA's regime, sure but this regime has done a great job of adding young talent as well. In the end, it's a process but I feel our rebuild won't really be a long one with the young talent we have.
He wanted to stay for years to come and made that clear in the off-season before he embarked in a season of disappointment for both self and team, the outcome sending each on divergent paths and a polarizing split.
"I’ve told you where I was at from the beginning, I felt like being a cornerstone part of that organization for the last four years, that’s where I called home and I wanted to be there," Donaldson said Sunday in an emotional interview with Sportsnet and The Athletic. "The fact of the matter is as a player, we can only control what we can control. I’m not authorizing decisions. What I can control is after a decision is made, turning it into a positive and trying to do the best that I can to turn the situation into a positive one
On another note:
Groshans 3/4 1hr 3rbi 1bb
Kirk 2/4 1hr 2rbi 1bb
Groshans, Pardinho, Stevenson, Lopez, Kirk, Lantigua, Moreno/Danner, Abbadessa, Conine, Contreras, Winckowski, etc should all be part of that Lansing team next season. Some of these guys will eventually form a wave that hits the majors in 2-3 years just as we are about ready to contend.Too bad they lost. Out of the playoffs now. Groshans started slow in Bluefield but really did well near the end. Could see him starting in Lansing next year.
Vancouver didn’t make the playoffs.
Corbin would be a very intriguing pitching target in free agency! Younger age for free agency with excellent numbers this year. 3.06 ERA supported by a 31.1% K rate and 6% walk rate. Elite 15.1% Swinging-strike rate, 2.36 FIP, 2.60 xFIP, 2.86 SIERA. Initial peripherals look very good!
Corbin has dominated right-handed hitters to the tune of .205/.252/.305 with a .243 wOBA against and a 31.1 K% and 5.2 BB% this year.
Slider is a money pitch: ridiculous 29% swinging-strike rate, 49.8% O-Swing, 26.2 Zone% which has led to a crazy .139/.185/.229 line against it for a 21 wRC+.
Corbin has also learned how to pitch with "Effective Velocity" which y'all should read about, but it simplifies to this:
A hitter is always trying to get the barrel of the bat to the ball. In order to do that on an inside pitch, he has to be quicker with his reaction. To do so with an outside pitch, he has to sit back and let the ball get deeper. So even though the pitches could have the same velocity out of the pitcher’s hand, “effectively” the pitches are sped up or slowed down depending on their location. This allows pitchers to create a perceived range of velocities to mess with the timing of a hitter by adding and subtracting with a single pitch.
If you check out Corbin's heat maps, you can see that he's really learned how to use this concept effectively which has allowed him to dominate despite declining velocity earlier in the year. The drop in velocity may also make him a cheaper free agent than his numbers would indicate making him a potential bargain. He should be a hot commodity but would love to see the Jays in on him!
Other free agent pitchers of interest imo are: Nathan Eovaldi, Derek Holland, and Trevor Cahill.