Ok I'll play.
Let's say Bread has a great season 90+ points, Presidents cup, we roll thru the playoffs and destroy Washington, Pittsburgh and Tampa along the way and win the Cup vs Vegas (insert whatever names you want). Panarin plays great. THe CBJ are the darlings of the league. The CBJ offer him a MAX deal.
If he walks at that point many people will question him and what is his priority (winning vs lifestyle). He would have every right to leave but if this team plays great it will make it very tough for him to leave.
I am late to the party.
In my old heart, I would hope that a run and a good time with teammates would sway Panarin to re-sign with CBJ.
But I have to recognize that a) Panarin has the absolute right in July 2019 to look at offers from every team; b) Columbus is not that hot of a city for a 20-30 year old unless children are involved; c) the Russian community is not as established here as in some other cities that are purportedly "on the list;" d) Other than Bob, there are no other Russians on this team; e) ...f)...g)...h)….etc....
And just when I want to say this is a new phenomenon or a generation X / Y thing, and that there is less loyalty now, I am just wrong. This is just the ability to control one's life, and everyone, regardless of age, has had that control, whether we realized it or used it. And the old days of a team controlling a player for their career have been over for a long time. The business world sees employees, even key employees, staying on average 5 years at most, especially early in their careers.
Most on here are not in the same stratosphere as Panarin, and our job decisions don't affect a fanbase, but we each were entitled to make decisions when we took jobs, changed jobs, etc....
Why do we think loyalty to the CBJ, for Panarin, should be any different than our loyalty (or lack thereof) to our employer? We do think that it is or should be different...even those that recognize Panarin's right to decide, or point out that they root for the CBJ (not any individual player), that sentiment that there should be some heightened level of loyalty is lurking somewhere. It's because we are fans, because we invest emotionally in the team (well most of us do), and while the team may come first in our minds, the team is made up of individual players, some of whom we get attached to for a variety of reasons. Maybe its the amount of money they make that creates this sense that they owe the franchise something....I don't know.
And yet there is still some loyalty - both for Panarin and for us "regular folk" to our employers/organizations. It shows up in a variety of ways.
But each person has made decisions about where and for whom to work, whether after high school, undergrad, grad school....or just wanting/needing to change jobs. Those decisions were based on a ranking of priorities - maybe to be close to family, to earn more money, to work for a recognized employer, to avoid harsh winters, to be where our significant other would like to be, to be able to party, for health reasons, to get away from an overbearing boss, to seek a different challenge, etc.... And my experience has been that fellow professionals who have worked for a year or two with an organization have not built up the loyalty to a team as much as a professional who has been with the organization for 5+ years (no matter the generation). Most of us have been and are free agents every day of the week; we get to entertain offers or confidentially seek out another employer 24/7/365. Every day is a decision to stay with the employer/job we have.... sometimes that may be out of necessity or lack of opportunity, as we all don't have offers coming our way on a routine basis, let alone anticipated offers of $9+M per year for the next 8 years from a variety of locations looking to find us next summer - but for the most part we can leave our employer with 2 weeks notice, and start over, without much fanfare or criticism. Every day we show up is a decision to stay. And I've been on both ends of the spectrum... I was with my first firm for 18 months. The next firm still has me... 32 years later.
Yet NHL stars like Panarin, or any NHL player for that matter, do not have that freedom. They only get the chance to have that much control 1x or 2x during their career given the CBA in the NHL - and this will be his first and prime chance to have such control. I'm not apologizing for it, I'm not suggesting they have it rough, I'm not saying it's unfair. It is the system, and the players are paid very handsomely within that system. But when a player finally does get to choose his team, we have no idea what his ranking of priorities may be, or what priorities will drive his decision to go to X or to stay with the CBJ. He could end up with the Rangers not because of NYC night life but because of Russian cultural opportunities, or because flights to Russia are easier, or because his GF (and she seems more than that to him at this point) has her best friends or family in or near NYC (or pick any other city), or because there is a teammate there that he wants to play with and be able to socialize with after practices, games, or because he thinks they have more cash to build a perennial contender around him than Columbus, etc...
He could stay in Columbus because he strikes up a friendship with a neighbor in the next month who has the best restaurant in the world (to Panarin) (and where is that neighbor? or restaurant?).
I don't know or pretend to know any of the factors for Panarin. I do know that many factors affect these decisions - I've watched many professionals in my own organization agonize over these decisions, some staying, some leaving based on factors that only they can prioritize. Historically, significant others (and their families) tend to be high on the list of factors.
I get the sense that some think that if the CBJ offered Panarin the top dollar, why would he want to, how could he leave? The fact is other teams can offer him the same dollars or more (albeit one less year of term), and those teams may have other factors that make them more attractive. The CBJ may give Panarin a good chance to win, but leaving doesn't mean he values lifestyle over winning. Other teams offer a chance to win too - some with a better chance, some with less chance, over the long haul.
I hope Panarin has a crazy-good year with the CBJ. I hope he decides to stay. I REALLY hope he would decide to stay NOW. But that is nothing but the fandom in me.
What I realistically hope for is that I enjoy watching him without the overhanging angst of his upcoming decision (and Bob's/MGMT's). I hope the CBJ have a great year as a team.
And whatever Panarin's (and Bob's) decision is, I will live with it. He isn't Carter or Foote, neither is Bob, not even close. Panarin is living up to his contract, his agreement, his pledge, his handshake, his word. I anticipate he will do that for every game he dons a CBJ sweater.
I just hope that neighbor and restaurant show up and end up being first on Panarin's and his significant other's priority list. [/QUOTE]