BatherSeason
Registered User
It was the scripted interview with Mendes.When's the last time Dorion spoke to the media?
It was the scripted interview with Mendes.When's the last time Dorion spoke to the media?
And we don't get out of the first round with Zibanejad in 2017 playoffs. I was not a fan. Great shot, decent skater, good passer, but lacking desire to win anything at this level. Just my opinion. The next time he wins a crucial faceoff or board battle with the goalie pulled let me know!Can't believe some people are still defending the Zibanejad trade
How do you determine this?And we don't get out of the first round with Zibanejad in 2017 playoffs. I was not a fan. Great shot, decent skater, good passer, but lacking desire to win anything at this level. Just my opinion. The next team he wins a crucial faceoff or board battle with the goalie pulled let me know!
Didn't Zibanejad lead the Rangers in playoff scoring that year, including an OT winner?
20/20 biased hindsight.How do you determine this?
When's the last time Dorion spoke to the media?
And we don't get out of the first round with Zibanejad in 2017 playoffs. I was not a fan. Great shot, decent skater, good passer, but lacking desire to win anything at this level. Just my opinion. The next time he wins a crucial faceoff or board battle with the goalie pulled let me know!
At some point, the whole " He is only 19, he is only 20, he is only 22, etc..." is true, but you can't pay this guy 5M+ on potential, and definitely not in this market. He was still as Zibby as ever until this year, which coincidentally is a year where the organization has committed to a rebuild. No pressure which suits his game.
Didn't Zibanejad lead the Rangers in playoff scoring that year, including an OT winner?
How do you determine this?
I'm not sure why people here are debating this.
It was a widely held belief that Brassard was the better player at the time of the trade.
It was also a widely held belief that in 3 or 4 years time, Zib would be the better player.
It was a bad trade in that sense, but that year we were trying to go all in. Brassard was known at the time as "The" playoff guy. It was a gamble. Had we won the cup in any of the years he was here, it would of been a great trade.
If we add context into why this trade was made, it makes a hell of a lot more sense than just looking at the actual trade in a vacuum.
Sens have made a lot of bad deals, but I don't really think this one is all that bad.
To the 2nd round?Where did he lead them?
He did. 9pts in 12 games. I watched all the games and he was not the player he is today. Just more of the same.
I'm sure you watched the same games as I did. Points are great, but he was frustrating, inconsistent, and you don't have to share my opinion, but he isn't a winner. some guys have "it", and he didn't have it for me.He was a 50 point center when he was here. Maybe that doesn't live up to the hype of a 5th overall pick, but if you're not willing to pay $5M for a 50 point center, you aren't ever signing or keeping players.
$5M is the going rate for a 50 pt/year player, so even if he only produced like he did in 15/16, it would've been a fair contract.
Now that he's a PPG? It's a big bargain.
If Brady Tkachuk puts up 50 points in each of the next two years, guess what he'll ask for on his next contract? It'll be more than $5M a season.
Exactly. Brass was fantastic for us in the playoffs. Much better than Zib would have been.
Besides, we recouped a ton when we traded Brassard away. Where would Zib even fit in our current lineup? Would not getting traded have have given him the wakeup call he needed?
You can't play captain hindsight like that. We got what we wanted out of the trade. An experienced player who helped us in our playoff run. We even got a ton of assets back when we moved him. Win-win. We got the best of both worlds.
I'm sure you watched the same games as I did. Points are great, but he was frustrating, inconsistent, and you don't have to share my opinion, but he isn't a winner. some guys have "it", and he didn't have it for me.
He was 22 years old, and played like it.
I'm curious to know what you think of Logan Brown, who's about to turn 21, and is also frustrating and inconsistent. Does he still have potential or should we cut bait?
But he was going to need 5M+. I get the age part, but at some point you get stuck with potentially a bad contract paying for expectations and "hoping" he puts it all together.He was 22 years old, and played like it.
I'm curious to know what you think of Logan Brown, who's about to turn 21, and is also frustrating and inconsistent. Does he still have potential or should we cut bait?
But he was going to need 5M+. I get the age part, but at some point you get stuck with potentially a bad contract paying for expectations and "hoping" he puts it all together.
Love Logan Brown as a prospect. Is looking for 5M next year?
And we don't get out of the first round with Zibanejad in 2017 playoffs. I was not a fan. Great shot, decent skater, good passer, but lacking desire to win anything at this level. Just my opinion. The next time he wins a crucial faceoff or board battle with the goalie pulled let me know!
At some point, the whole " He is only 19, he is only 20, he is only 22, etc..." is true, but you can't pay this guy 5M+ on potential, and definitely not in this market. He was still as Zibby as ever until this year, which coincidentally is a year where the organization has committed to a rebuild. No pressure which suits his game.
Doubt it. But at some point you cannot pay players based on potential, not at that price threshold. I understand a lot of people liked him.If he comes in and scores 50 points? Yeah, he'll probably be looking for 5M on his next contract.
Granted on Couturier and Scheifele, but it doesn't always work out.Sean Couturier didn't crack 40 points until last year. He's now a PPG centre.
Scheifele didn't hit his stride until about 2 years ago. He's now a PPG centre.
I understand the need to justify the deal, but we **** the bed by not paying Zib. Flyers and Jets had no issue sticking with their guys and paying them, and we chose not to invest in Zib's potential.
Zib scored the OT Golden goal in the WJC for Sweden. You can't tell me he wasn't/isn't a big game player. He had barely scratched the surface of his potential, and we dumped him for a fraction of his value.
Doubt it. But at some point you cannot pay players based on potential, not at that price threshold. I understand a lot of people liked him.
Granted on Couturier and Scheifele, but it doesn't always work out.
I did say accomplishing something at this level. I guess Mark Slaney became a big time player? There are so many players, i.e. Curtis Lazar and Co. that simply don't pan out at the NHL level. If Ottawa kept Zibby and in year three, in a meaningless season, he is PPG, are the other two years prior just forgotten?