- Aug 24, 2006
- 7,512
- 18,876
Your guess is as good as anyone's, though there was speculation on the Twitters that other teams likely put in a claim on him.
I think Turbo's defense is short-sold a bit, he's not some world beater but for a skill winger he's above average. Definitely not some Skinner/Eberle type where I'm not sure they'd know who's in net for their own team most nights.
Saw this on one of the trade threads, in reference to CAR potentially trading McElhinney:
They can't trade him unless they were the only team that put in a claim or he clears waivers.
From the CBA:
A Player who has been acquired by Waiver claim shall not be Traded to another Club until the termination of Playoffs of the season in which he was acquired unless he is first offered on the same terms to the Club(s) that entered a claim when Waivers were requested originally and the offer has been refused.
First off, I don't see that he needs to clear waivers from CAR...not sure where the OP got that notion, from what's quoted above, anyway.
Second, does this mean that you would have to negotiate terms of a trade with one team, then present that same offer to a second team that had put in a claim on the original waiver, and that second team would have first right of refusal of those terms?
This is very weird. Let's say the deal was for a third rounder, and the first team you struck a deal with was a bottom-feeder, and the second team was a team who would likely make the playoffs (therefore the value of the pick is lessened), the terms of the agreement are not equal.
I keep pwning the Flames fans on the main board who continue to labor under the delusion that Lindholm > Ferland
To each his own, but I wouldn't rush to say either player is better. I think the trade worked out well for both sides, and both teams got the player they needed. Lindholm needed a change of scenery. He's off to a hell of a start, and was always the part of that trade I didn't like, but it got us Ferland, and he's added offense and power up front that was sorely needed.
Yes and no. He was "injured" on a play late in the game against Detroit enough so that he was able to leave the ice even though the Canes had just iced the puck. However, he never left the bench area, so it was not thought to be anything more than a stinger at the time. Coaching staff says the yellow jersey was just being extra cautious and Pesce wanted to skate as normally during practice.
Ferland is not even two-way player, he can't touch Lindy defense. Lindholm is better playmaker and legit PK-er.but when you compare him to Ferland as things currently stand at this moment in time, I think Ferland is better in several ways.
Ferland as a "don't-****-with-us" presence is pretty great, though.
Ferland is way more talented than advertised, so it makes the Lindholm part of the deal not so bad for me even with Lindholm being younger, better defensively and finally starting to fulfill his potential. Ferland appears to have some untapped offensive potential himself, and he's the type of power forward I've wanted for years and years now.
I'm actually more disappointed with the Hamilton/Hanifin part of the deal, and that was as someone skeptical of Hanifin's ceiling even when he was here. Hamilton just hasn't looked more than average outside maybe a few periods this season, so I'm hoping he gets it together soon.
I'm impressed with Ferland thus far. Dude can ball, err, puck. He's a ball of energy that isn't afraid of kicking some ass, which is good because watching this team get bullied for years was not fun, at some point you have to punch the bully back and Ferland provides that fearlessness.
Hamilton is like a roller coaster. For every bad play he's helped keep the score what it is at that moment at times. He made a couple of nice plays in the Detroit game when the Wings were attacking. I am hoping once he breaks through on a goal the floodgates will open and his overall play will improve.
Agree. Wasn't Martinook also supposed to provide some of that toughness as well? Have to say I haven't seen much from him regarding that.
not sure how much of it was "toughness" vs. "tough to play against". Martinook hasn't shown the physicality of Ferland, but I've been pleasantly surprised by his speed, forecheck and puck pursuit. He's been playing kind of like Foegele (light) where he has been a bit of a pain in the ass to the other teams.
Agree. Wasn't Martinook also supposed to provide some of that toughness as well? Have to say I haven't seen much from him regarding that.
He’s been great for what he is. I had thought he was just “the guy coming back” for us to shed salary with Kruger, but he has been worth trading for on his own merits.not sure how much of it was "toughness" vs. "tough to play against". Martinook hasn't shown the physicality of Ferland, but I've been pleasantly surprised by his speed, forecheck and puck pursuit. He's been playing kind of like Foegele (light) where he has been a bit of a pain in the ass to the other teams.