I'm concerned about Bettman trying to become Roger Goodell and arbitrarily throw his weight around in suspending people at his whim.
Which is in no way an endorsement or defense of the behavior of Mailloux or Miller, both those guys are a-holes, but I don't like the precedent being set here.
I don't know if it's so much throwing his weight around as it is just not having some sort of protocol/standards/etc. for these Miller/Mailloux blacklisting situations.
If the Canadiens knew that Mailloux can't play at the NHL level without the league's blessing, would they have used a 1st rounder on him?
In the Miller case, would the Coyotes (being a team that has trouble attracting players (as well as fans, buildings, good owners and GM's, etc.)) have freely given up his rights as a draft pick if they knew in just two years time he'd be able to sign an NHL contract wherever he was wanted?
But not just for players, you've also got all the staff that were involved in the Blackhawks scandal that were pretty much forced to resign. If I recall, the only thing that was really put in place there was something around Quenneville needing to have a meeting with Bettman if/when he decides he wants to get back in the league in some capacity.
They should have something set up where players/staff get some "status" as suspended for a certain period of time, or indefinitely with some sort of periodic review where they look at each case and announce (to the teams at the very least) whose status has or hasn't changed. Obviously the Miller and Mailloux dirty laundry was known to the league prior to their drafts. Perhaps the league should/'ve had some kind of tag they could put on them that says something like "Draft at your own risk, but understand that these individuals can't be signed to an ELC/play an NHL game/etc etc. without some process/review by the league." which might dissuade teams from picking them altogether?