Triumph
Registered User
- Oct 2, 2007
- 13,573
- 13,981
As usual we agree on 90% of things but you insist on drawing a distinct line in the sand about the other 10%.
Who cares that Toffoli had a wide open chance he whiffed on? That's an excellent rebuttal if someone is arguing that the Flyers didn't give up any great chances at all, but that's not what's being said. You love pontificating about confirmation bias - maybe you should focus on how much strawmanning goes on. The Flyers had their own breakaways and odd man rushes they failed to convert on.
Yes - I just think that's hockey, teams get chances, they don't convert on most of them. I just don't agree that the Flyers just walked into their chances and the Devils had to work for everything. That's why I am talking about confirmation bias. The Flyers did block more shots, but they also gave up some very wide open looks - looks that if they had resulted in goals against us, we'd hear the same complaints.
In a vacuum I don't care about Jack f***ing this game up. But this is part of a pattern - for the team, not him individually - and that's a major f***ing problem. This is not an issue that you can just write off as a one-off that they will move on from, because they have failed to do that for the entire season now.
I think they have gotten considerably better at puck management as the season has gone on. It hasn't been a constant, obviously, but they're giving up fewer goals off neutral zone and offensive zone turnovers, or at least it feels that way. Vanecek making some saves helps. Jack has to learn not to force stuff when it's not working for him. I feel like most of the other guys have gotten better at this.
I'm not going to claim I don't have any bias because all of us do to varying degrees. But it's pretty insulting and condescending to claim authority about who does or doesn't have more of it than anyone else. It's not like I don't ever come on here and recognize when I see things differently. I had a post just about a week ago giving credit to the team for improving their puck management - but the last few periods of hockey have been another step back towards the pattern we've seen for a long time now. And I could easily lob the bias claim right back at you and say you're looking at things through rose-colored analytics purist glasses.
I definitely have lots of biases. I do tend to be more optimistic about stuff. I just think being unaware of this particular bias is weird.