KIRK
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 109,700
- 51,216
Jesus Bylsma just put Vitale on LW and let the goals flow already. Enough with the foreplay.
It . . . will . . . not . . . happen . . . ever.
Jesus Bylsma just put Vitale on LW and let the goals flow already. Enough with the foreplay.
Glass looked better than ET and Kennedy, but that isn't exactly a ringing endorsment. It HAS to be brutally evident to Shero that he needs to get a winger for Sid (Kunitz can go back to Geno).
Question, with this half a season, is there a trade deadline? I mean, i assume there is, but when is it?
Jesus Bylsma just put Vitale on LW and let the goals flow already. Enough with the foreplay.
Speaking of Joe Victory as a winger, I'd love to see him as a right winger on the 4th line with Adams in the press box where he belongs. Something like a Tangradi - Jeffrey - Vitale type of deal.
If Glass is going to be with Geno for another game, that is. Hell I don't get why Bylsma won't try Jeffrey with Geno & Neal. Or even Cooke. Glass? Whatever, at this point the dumb stuff Bylsma does is expected.
I agree here, even though Glass should on paper be no where near a top 6... He did seem to create space for them or be able to hold the puck in... If Tangradi isn't going to be the legit power forward we need on this team this season. Maybe a poor mans power forward is the answer as the team is as a roster right now.
Give him a 2-3 cup of coffee on that line and see how it works out. They are producing on their own (Neal and Malkin)... So why not give it a try. It could not hurt, its a no cost option.
I'd give Malkin a minus for 2/3 of the game, but Malkin and Neal looked better with Glass in the third period of this game than they've looked with anyone else all season. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think you'll find yourself in a small minority on this one.
EDIT: Just looked. Malkin was credited with 4 takeaways in this game, and I'm pretty sure all of them came in the third . . . with Glass out there with him. He's not a solution, but he's better than any alternative, I think.
I suppose it is a somewhat desperate solution, but at this point I would like to see Vitale as the third wheel on the Malkin line. He is dedicated defensively, makes the simple plays, has the prerequisite speed and surely has better hands than for instance Glass. As added benefits Vitale can take draws on Geno's off-side and when he gets open Geno will like having a RH shot to go to.
It would hurt the 4th line (probably not as much as Kennedy's absence is hurting the third though) and isn't a long term solution, but Vitale is the most Talbot like option we have. I suppose what I am saying is that it could work. OR... considering that he is about the only player we haven't seen there yet, I am way out of bounds .
Jesus Bylsma just put Vitale on LW and let the goals flow already. Enough with the foreplay.
Yes, it's something like March 4th.
The Trade Deadline is set for April 3rd.
I see the Ducks are bringing up Emerson Etem. I think he was picked right after Bennett. Would it hurt to bring Bennett up just to see? I don't think so. Course I think they said he was hurt at the moment, and maybe there's a waiver issue I missed
Tangradi -> Kennedy -> Glass -> Bennett
Let's put Lovejoy on wing
Hell he's the deepest player in the offensive zone while playing defense half the time, at least that way when he's not playing defense you can forgive it a little.
Oh and it would allow Bortuzzo/Despre/? to actually develop as well.
If we are putting a defenseman on the wing. I want Engo on the wing. Engo would be good in front of the net.
Agree to disagree, and I know you're probably shaking your head in disbelief at that, I just think that nerves are a factor but not anywhere to the degree you're saying. I know he hasn't played a ton but he's logged 40+ NHL games now. Yeah the linemates are great and the pressure to produce is there, but I think despite all that you just play hockey after awhile. I've never heard of a documented case where a player was just so blown away by his linemates that he was rendered virtually ineffective for 3 games but in reality had much more talent.
I agree the benching is weird and it has always seemed like Bylsma has had it out for him. To your point a regular shift on the 4th line is likely a good thing. As Grove mentioned this morning, the pressure will be off and he'll be getting a regular shift. My only word of caution is that, whatever line he's on, he is going to have to show at least a Matt Cooke-level of potential for offense at some point very soon.
It's really not something that can be debated, TBH.
When a player is afraid of being benched for every little mistake they make, they're going to over-think every little play and eventually make more mistakes.