Not talking about what Mark Streit achieved previously. What he was at the time.
Pittsburgh loved him enough to dress him in 3 games. He wasn't even .5 pt/game with the Flyers and was -10.
Ceci so far is .5 pt/game and +3 playing beside Rielly in a top 4 role. He's young and a right shot D. Easily gets a 3rd-4th rounder every day of the week.
Is this realistic:
Puljujarvi + Russell for Weber
Weber salary would be offset by Russell. Does anyone have to add?
Cool. Trade him for a 3rd-4th rounder.
Not talking about what Mark Streit achieved previously. What he was at the time.
Pittsburgh loved him enough to dress him in 3 games. He wasn't even .5 pt/game with the Flyers and was -10.
Ceci so far is .5 pt/game and +3 playing beside Rielly in a top 4 role. He's young and a right shot D. Easily gets a 3rd-4th rounder every day of the week.
The same applies to literally every player I mentioned above. Pretty sure I was told that Zaitsev was never going to be moved as well. We can revisit if Ceci is moved later in the year
I cannot imagine that's a basis for a trade that Montreal would consider.
No one is worried about Weber retiring...
We're worried that he won't retire and we'd be stuck with his 8 million dollar caphit for the next 30 years.
If your goal is to dump an aging player who is deteriorating rapidly then I can see them taking any offer they can get. I am not sure there is a market for Weber given his contract and age.
I also don't see Bergevin ever trading Weber simply because he views it as his signature move and thinks Weber is a unicorn.
Is this realistic:
Puljujarvi + Russell for Weber
Weber salary would be offset by Russell. Does anyone have to add?
If your goal is to dump an aging player who is deteriorating rapidly then I can see them taking any offer they can get. I am not sure there is a market for Weber given his contract and age.
I also don't see Bergevin ever trading Weber simply because he views it as his signature move and thinks Weber is a unicorn.
Nashville should be very worried about him retiring before the end of the contract.
If your goal is to dump an aging player who is deteriorating rapidly then I can see them taking any offer they can get. I am not sure there is a market for Weber given his contract and age.
I also don't see Bergevin ever trading Weber simply because he views it as his signature move and thinks Weber is a unicorn.
If you say so.
If he was worth a 3rd round draft pick today the Maple Leafs would be fools to not flip him for 3rd right now.
You're serious deluded if you think Cody Ceci has any kind fo value at all.
Bookmark his response because 100% ceci will get a 4th lol....
Polak got two seconds...
Or you could try to put some effort into your argument, I provided 1 example without any research at all. You're offering a (poor) opinion and little understanding of the Leafs blueline.
Saying Cody Ceci is awful is a poor opinion?
As for understanding the Leafs blue line I think I have a very good understanding of it. I've been saying for three years if they spent resources to shore up their blue line by adding defenseman that actually play defence the team could be a contender.
However, for three off-seasons in a row, the General Manager has done absolutely nothing to make it better and this summer he inexplicably made it even softer and weaker defensively.
7.86 cap hit till the end of 2025-26 (7 seasons, including this one)
Actual salary per year: (Age to start season in brackets)
19-20 - 6.0 (34)
20-21 - 6.0 (35)
21-22 - 6.0 (36)
22-23 - 3.0 (37)
23-24 - 1.0 (38)
24-25 - 1.0 (39)
25-26 - 1.0 (40)
As much as HF wants to believe it, Weber will not play out his final 3 years of his contract at 1.0 per year after making 120 million over the course of his career.
So you're looking at a below average 1st pairing guy, or good second pairing guy for the next 4 seasons at a 7.86 cap hit.
Saying Ceci wouldn't fetch a 3rd or a 4th is a poor opinion based on historical evidence that suggests otherwise.
I don't know how many times I tried saying this over the past few years. We essentially traded 6 years of Subban under contract for 6 years of Weber. The end of his contact was never our concern.I brought up Weber’s contract as being a negative in a thread this morning but when you actually look at it, it isn’t near as bad as it appears as long as he can manage not to decline out of a top 4 role. It really is just three more years after this and we won’t have to worry about recapture the way Nashville does when he does retire once the $1 million pay cheque’s start coming yearly.
Right, just like Luongo.
wait...
well if you are happy with a bag of pucks for weber retained.....