Wrote about the game last night, here:
2/26/2020 – Utica Comets vs. Rochester Americans
Pros:
- Sven Baertschi still playing like an NHL'er in a lower-tier. Excellent vision in the offensive zone. He's on the ice for a gross number of shot-attempts against, but its forgivable given what he can create out of nothing.
- Brogan Rafferty/Guillaume Brisebois pairing was solid, good puck movement (when the Comets successfully did move the puck) and defensive ability displayed by both. Brise had two stellar moments where he broke up some lightning fast two-on-one's from Rochester, led by Casey Mittelstadt
- Olli Juolevi - had a quiet game which is a compliment in this case given how badly the Comets were pinned into their own end through much of the 60-minute affair -- Blew me away with his one backcheck. Overall a really impressive outing from him after a couple games away with injury. We heard around his draft that he was a notorious slow-starter who turned things up in the back-half of the season. Would do wonders to his stock if he could have more repeat performances like last nights
- Di Pietro kept them in it throughout... Should have never been in overtime or the shootout after that brutal non-call on Baertschi, but such is hockey.
- LeBlanc and Malone were great practically every shift until the third period when the Comets collapsed trying to protect the lead -- not really a condemnation of the fourth-line, but they got pinned into their zone several shifts late in the second/early in the third and were practically unused in the final 10 minutes of the game
Cons:
- Blujus/Chatfield pairing were dreadful
- Comets defending the rush is laughable -- just standing still and hope they can intercept a pass on the cycle to disrupt the shot-attempt...no one takes on the body, and mostly they spend their defending time in the zone chasing or dropping to a knee to block shots only. There's toughness in blocking shots, but as we saw on the game-tying goal with 30 seconds left, it resulted in a poor bounce that Di PIetro ad no chance seeing or saving. For a team with a former defenceman as a coach, it blows me away that the system they have for defending in their end is so rudimentary and basic, verging on "not a system but just hope that things eventually work out."
Comets defending the rush is laughable -- just standing still and hope they can intercept a pass on the cycle to disrupt the shot-attempt...no one takes on the body, and mostly they spend their defending time in the zone chasing or dropping to a knee to block shots only. There's toughness in blocking shots, but as we saw on the game-tying goal with 30 seconds left, it resulted in a poor bounce that Di PIetro ad no chance seeing or saving. For a team with a former defenceman as a coach, it blows me away that the system they have for defending in their end is so rudimentary and basic, verging on "not a system but just hope that things eventually work out."
I have explained this in detail, complained about while posting game play by play as the games progressed on AHL/TV, and been brain drained as to how a career D-man coupled with a guy who runs the defense can put a team on the ice with as you say "not a system but just hope that things eventually work out." Thus, in various ways I have been posting on this very issue all season long right through the 8-0 streak to start the season to nearly my last post. I haven't even watched a high school team with this level of lack of attention to a defensive scheme. it carries from the D-men right on out to every forward. There isn't even a defensive duo combined with a single forward 3-some that can be deployed in their own end that you can count on for a solid defensive effort.
Baertschi/Camper/Boucher (or whomever centers that duo) can be expected to be on the ice for goals against. They were out there for both of them last night. They have to outscore their opponent because their goals against will be the difference if they don't.
Their lack of physicality is appalling. I don't mean hard body checking. I mean getting in front of the puck carrier and denying him space by getting into his body and forcing him wide and eventually into losing the puck. The clip you showed of Jasek having the chance to do just that (6th bullet in the first period), but instead poking his stick at the guy who then blew by him for a dangerous scoring chance. This is the way all the forwards defend.
Your shot charts were the most illuminating factual pieces of evidence that have been provided about the way the Comets surrender quality scoring chance after quality scoring chance. The most critical aspect of their game is the play of their goalies. They have to have more than just good goal tending. It has to be lights out every single game and the record shows that it just can't be that over the top every single game. If they had actually been playing the kind of defense that any semblance of a coach instills in his team, this outfit, in spite of it's lack of centers and the weakness that comes from such a young defensive corps, would be contending for the top spot in the North Division instead of trying to hang onto a playoff position.
Orcatown's post just above yours concurs with our thoughts on the poor defensive play.
Seems like some readers just don't want to hear about the facts of the games and how they are played. After all that is all we are doing, relating what the team and it's individual players are doing during their 60 minutes of ice time every game. It's not our fault that it doesn't include large numbers of platitudes and descriptions of sterling play. The game's play from the opening face off to the final horn gets related as it occurs. This is the most frustrating team I have ever hooked my wagon to. They do so many things that are just not examples of good play.
Then Baertschi or Goldobin will dazzle you with an outstanding play that produces a goal. Mikey will stand on his head many times more than any keeper should be asked to do. Juolevi or Blujus will dangerously sacrifice themselves to painfully block a shot. Boucher will rip one of his patented one timers from his office. Jasek will finally connect on one of his many ill fated cross ice passes and Lind or Bailey will finish it off. Rafferty in spite of several terrible passes in his own zone will finally hit someone with a long stretch pass and it turns into a goal. Sautner or Brisebois will finally put one of their scores of shots at the goal finally on net and lead to a rebound goal or a rarely seen goal for one of them. Thus, in spite of being badly outshot, hemmed in their own zone for large parts of every period, turnover after turnover, penalty after penalty (they have spent much of the season as the most penalized team in the AHL), surrendered SHGs (#1 in the AHL), they come out on top. Other times all of the negatives just can't be overcome.
I fear the lack of sound systems will be their downfall.