Lock
Registered User
- Apr 5, 2008
- 255
- 0
haha.
I thought about the Calgary angle as well. Namely because it riles up the Calgary fanbase even more than this one. Calgary Puck is going ballistic with this lol.
That almost makes it worth it. But what you state may be how things originally went down as more of a in Calgarys face gesture. It is really odd that the Flames would need permission from the Oilers to call the games the same thing that we call them. Understand as well that the Oilers also have rights to any merchandise so inscribed.
I was thinking that too except that it doesnt make much sense. I see that term all over the place, sports writers and the NHL use it all the time in game previews or write-ups and no one has said a word in what, 15 years? So what, its just never come up?
The thing is, their one major obligation is to defend their trademark and they very clearly havent done it as we see it all the time and its just arisen as an issue.
So whats the more likely scenario? Someone at some point thought it would be smart to trademark, the defense of the trademark has fallen by the wayside since then but all of a sudden the Oilers feel the need to flex some muscle against the Rush who they know cant afford to defend themselves?
If the Oilers tried to prohibit the Flames from using that term they'd be laughed out of the province.