Battle? More like beatdown
This team is truly embarrassing.
No argument about the embarrassing part, but really, as bad as this Oiler team has been, they haven't taken an inordinate number of "beatdowns".
I've been surprised by that all through these terrible tanking years of Katz's ownership.
I wonder, how is it that a team this bad doesn't get really unloaded on at least once a month?
Maybe I've just blocked the "beatdowns" out of my mind, and I need to be corrected here.
On the other hand, when there was a Battle of Alberta, the Oilers regularly handed out beatdowns to the Flames and most other teams in the league as well.
Imagine being a Flame fan and knowing that
the only time your city has managed to assemble a team worth bragging about they got dismantled by the Oilers as a matter of course. The only reason they called it a "battle" was because of all the (Flamer) blood that got shed on the ice,
not because the final outcome was ever in doubt.
People want to blame the death of the BoA on the Oilers, but really what have the Flames done? Middle of the pack losers (just like the Oilers were for most of the nineties). Is that really something to hang your hat on - especially when you had one of the best goaltenders and one of the best power forwards in the league and just couldn't find
any pieces to go with them? Kipper and Iggy wasted their whole careers in Calgary.
There will never be another BoA like it was in the day. The chances of Edmonton and Calgary ever being that good again at the same time is almost zero.
And while I'm at it, Edmonton will never be the City of Champions again. That little embarrassment should be retired along with the BoA.
Certainly not in favor of the Rush using it, but under no circumstances would I ever care enough to try and get them to desist. I guess that's the Oilers for you, petty to the core.