Brisson is also from Manhattan Beach, California.... Perhaps our early contender to replace Long Beach Native Matt Nieto?
If Amirov and Reichel are off the board, Brisson is who I want. He's a smart player with a lot of skill. If Button is right that Brisson will continue on a steep developmental upswing, he'd be a great pick.
I don't know who Yanic St Pierre is and I'm not about to watch a 20 min video on Brisson but there are plenty of people who speak highly of him. Button, Pronman, and the people at Hockey Prospect to name a few. The latter two have Brisson in their top 15.
You're not going to get a perfect prospect at 25th overall. He's going to a good college program and his skills, including his skating, will continue to develop. He's a longer-term guy, but one that could pay dividends quite handsomely if/when he's ready for the NHL.He’s on a stacked team and half of his goals are from the power play. The average skating is also a big concern.
I don't know who Yanic St Pierre is and I'm not about to watch a 20 min video on Brisson but there are plenty of people who speak highly of him. Button, Pronman, and the people at Hockey Prospect to name a few. The latter two have Brisson in their top 15.
You're not going to get a perfect prospect at 25th overall. He's going to a good college program and his skills, including his skating, will continue to develop. He's a longer-term guy, but one that could pay dividends quite handsomely if/when he's ready for the NHL.
You're not wrong, but the system the Avs run can cover up for poor skating. Kadri isn't a great skater, Graves can be wobbly at times. Having MacKinnon and Makar mask a lot of the skating deficiencies of other players. EJ is good "for his size." With Brisson, he only needs to be good enough to fit in with the current identity of the Avs.Right but poor skating, on the Avs especially, can be problematic. Look at Jost and Jost was supposed to be a good skater prior to his draft. If you watch that video, he makes the point that Brisson’s skating is likely a finished product because he most likely has already worked with skate coaches.
Why Gabe? Brisson is a fantastic player and someone I believe in much more than Jarvis. Brisson has strong skating, fantastic IQ, can stickhandle close around the net, and is a brilliant goalscorer. People will say he had consistency issues, but he had one of the second best half of the years compared to any prospect for this draft. My only negative on him is that he had many points on the powerplay and junior PP points don't really translate to the pros. However, he has all the makings of being a very solid second liner and suggest that his hockey IQ and ability to carry the puck on the rush will put him as an excellent eventual replacement for Kadri.Please NO!
He most definitely NOT ever be like or play like PLD. That's a really bad comparison, Brisson plays more like Zetterberg, but is more of a goalscorer or William Karlsson.Pronman has him ranked 15th and Button threw out a PLD comparison:
Barron is a good player, but I suggest him falling is also due to him not having a lot of talent either. I don't think I would like his selection, but not because he's terrible, but because other players have just outplayed him. He'd be more along the lines of drafting someone like Guhle or Schneider - high floor but not high ceiling players. He has great puck-rushing ability, but I don't really see a lot of IQ in terms of being able to make plays out of nothing like Makar nor very good puck distribution skills like Seth Jones. He looks very similar to Brendan Guhle for me, extremely good skater who does a lot of good, but has zero finish product.I’d be happy with Barron assuming he’s ok medically. Quite honestly he’d go a lot higher if not for the lost time and blood clots, but at 25, I’d think he’s worth the risk. For some reason I had been under the impression that he missed time from a concussion. Hopefully whatever problem he has isn’t as problematic.
You're not wrong, but the system the Avs run can cover up for poor skating. Kadri isn't a great skater, Graves can be wobbly at times. Having MacKinnon and Makar mask a lot of the skating deficiencies of other players. EJ is good "for his size." With Brisson, he only needs to be good enough to fit in with the current identity of the Avs.
With regards to Jost, like a lot of people have said his skating doesn't work at center. He's fine on the wing, but doesn't play on the wing all that often because the Avs have better wingers than him. If Brisson is meant to become a center, then he'll need to continue working on his skating, sure, but every player should be doing that anyway, in my opinion.
Agree to disagree. From the clips I've seen of Brisson his skating doesn't look noticeably worse than most kids his age. It's not like we're looking at a Timmins here. He doesn't appear to have breakaway speed, but he gets around the ice fine. If they draft him as a winger, I think he'll be perfectly capable of a middle-6 role at some point in his career.Jost is routinely devoured by the speed of the game regardless of playing at W or C.
Also, it’s been established by sound reasoning that Brisson’s skating might be as good (or close to it) as it’s going to get.
Barron is a good player, but I suggest him falling is also due to him not having a lot of talent either. I don't think I would like his selection, but not because he's terrible, but because other players have just outplayed him. He'd be more along the lines of drafting someone like Guhle or Schneider - high floor but not high ceiling players. He has great puck-rushing ability, but I don't really see a lot of IQ in terms of being able to make plays out of nothing like Makar nor very good puck distribution skills like Seth Jones. He looks very similar to Brendan Guhle for me, extremely good skater who does a lot of good, but has zero finish product.
Re: Brisson
I hate when I read complete opposite reports on the same player.
Some say he's undersized and has below average skating (which gives me Jost PTSD)...THW, however, says he has good acceleration and speed and uses his speed to backcheck and help the D.
Same thing happened last year with Newhook...some people said skating was his strength, others said that his poor skating was holding him back.
PS: @tigervixxxen is Brisson on your "nepotism" list? His dad and Joe are good friends aren't they?
My entire post is that there are better defenders available, now I am still watching games but one of the last ones I've seen is Grans and I would easily draft him over those three. Superior offensive alien weaponry to the triad you listed above.Consequently, I’d be thrilled with Schneider, Guhle, or Barron.
It depends on where you draft who and why, again Barron is a solid prospect but as of now he's more of a second rounder that you'd hope rebounds to his hyped potential of one/two years ago. Him getting injured is unfortunate, but before that he dropped like a lead balloon in the rankings is because Halifax was bad and he wasn't necessarily good either. I think there's a legit question that he was a product of Mooseheads beast team, which could've exacerbated his talent level like Stefan Elliott did to Duncan Siemens. Now, for me personally, you don't draft defenders like Siemens, Guhle, and Fleury as high as teams did and there is a good chance the triad will be the next line of defenders who might not necessarily be busts per se, but ones who got drafted higher than their talent says. You draft either pure offensive defenders or all-around worldly defenders high because their talent level dictates that appropriation. You don't draft defenders just because of defence and skating high because that's what we did with Siemens.How is a RD with the defense, skating, and shot not what the Avs need?
People will see what I mean when he enters the NHL... but context is important, skating as it applies to a center and playing both ends of the ice well. Smaller centers need to have a certain level of skating to translate to the NHL at a high level there. Moving to wing mitigates those skating issues, also throwing caution to the wind on one side of the ice. Newhook has NHL level skating at wing for sure, I remain cautious at center.@ him. It's @henchman24. He's the one.
My entire post is that there are better defenders available, now I am still watching games but one of the last ones I've seen is Grans and I would easily draft him over those three. Superior offensive alien weaponry to the triad you listed above.
It depends on where you draft who and why, again Barron is a solid prospect but as of now he's more of a second rounder that you'd hope rebounds to his hyped potential of one/two years ago. Him getting injured is unfortunate, but before that he dropped like a lead balloon in the rankings is because Halifax was bad and he wasn't necessarily good either. I think there's a legit question that he was a product of Mooseheads beast team, which could've exacerbated his talent level like Stefan Elliott did to Duncan Siemens. Now, for me personally, you don't draft defenders like Siemens, Guhle, and Fleury as high as teams did and there is a good chance the triad will be the next line of defenders who might not necessarily be busts per se, but ones who got drafted higher than their talent says. You draft either pure offensive defenders or all-around worldly defenders high because their talent level dictates that appropriation. You don't draft defenders just because of defence and skating high because that's what we did with Siemens.
I suggest his hockey IQ will be more important to potentially making it as a centre compared to his skating. Point is a good example of someone who doesn't really have amazing skating but his smarts allows him to survive in the middle of the ice.People will see what I mean when he enters the NHL... but context is important, skating as it applies to a center and playing both ends of the ice well. Smaller centers need to have a certain level of skating to translate to the NHL at a high level there. Moving to wing mitigates those skating issues, also throwing caution to the wind on one side of the ice. Newhook has NHL level skating at wing for sure, I remain cautious at center.
The concern on Brisson's skating translating at center is a real risk and he needs to improve that area of his game to keep being a center in the NHL. I have no qualms about it holding him back from the NHL.
I mean his IQ is high but he's also one of the best skaters in the league currently.I suggest his hockey IQ will be more important to potentially making it as a centre compared to his skating. Point is a good example of someone who doesn't really have amazing skating but his smarts allows him to survive in the middle of the ice.
And he's well worth the risk compared to the three lads IMHO. For the record, my interpretation of him is when he has the puck he's a very good, has good decisions, and can quarterback the powerplay quite effectively. It's when he doesn't have the puck he tends to drift away and skate from where he's supposed to be - those issues you can fix though with constant coaching/reminders. I don't see bad skating within his game either, but I admit it's bit hard to evaluate when you have more room on international size.I saw the DD player evaluation on Grans. I almost got sucked in because it started off doting on his first pass. But then it went onto go into great depth about how he repeatedly uses poor judgment and is careless. Grans has tools but I’m not convinced he can be taught to use good judgment. It’s a huge red flag for me. Poor judgment, bad skating, and concussions are big red flags for me.
Who, Point? Compared to the best skaters in all positions I don't think he cracks the top 10 or 15 for me.I mean his IQ is high but he's also one of the best skaters in the league currently.
He has drafting Commesso in 3rd round, Rempe in the 4th round, and Usau in the 5th.
I suggest his hockey IQ will be more important to potentially making it as a centre compared to his skating. Point is a good example of someone who doesn't really have amazing skating but his smarts allows him to survive in the middle of the ice.