Yes I hope for a good pick in first round but it would be nice to draft someone who comes better than advertised--other teams seem to hit on this more than Sabres. Maybe just me being a Monday morning quarterback but when I see second round picks from last year -Kaliyev and Jenik- burning up the OHL averaging a goal a game and 2 points per game--and both being used on the PK-I grit my teeth.
Well, ask yourself what do other teams look at when they are scouting that the Sabres aren't? Why is it that teams that put a premium on something that one can measure (like say, D or D-1 primary point generation or draft year production in the SHL or PPG scoring totals in Swedish or Finnish junior leagues) can turn up players who are
shockingly able to out produce their draft location? Or why is it that in an era when data is more and more important, that the data folks look at the Sabres draft tendencies and scratch their heads?
And then further, why is it that most of their high-end prospects get rushed even if there are clear signs that they aren't fully ready? Mittelstadt and Thompson last year are prime examples of that.
They are not good at scouting or evaluation. They haven't been in a long time and their management team is not grabbing onto cutting edge shifts in assessment from what is written about them.
This isn't about the players. This is about who they draft and how they develop them.