Nucklehead Supreme
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2011
- 4,313
- 2,231
Not the initial one, nope. With such little proof, hence your conjecture, based on a baseless opinion.You’re not making an assertion? Guess again.
Not the initial one, nope. With such little proof, hence your conjecture, based on a baseless opinion.You’re not making an assertion? Guess again.
Not the initial one is the best you’ve got? So you just want to run around with a ptchfork but without shoes on? That’s cool.Not the initial one, nope. With such little proof, hence your conjecture, based on a baseless opinion.
Yes, you made the initial assertion, I called out your initial assertion, based on the fact that you hold no proof other than a weak opinion based on conjecture. Rutherford doesn't leak things, hasn't anywhere he has been. Everyone seems to be aware of this except you, like how nobody knew that JT Miller was gonna be signed to that dumbass contract, nor if he was gonna be traded, or what for, everything was rumours not tied to management, because management wasn't saying shit.Not the initial one is the best you’ve got? So you just want to run around with a ptchfork but without shoes on? That’s cool.
Rutherfords not leaking things? What’s your proof?Yes, you made the initial assertion, I called out your initial assertion, based on the fact that you hold no proof other than a weak opinion based on conjecture. Rutherford doesn't leak things, hasn't anywhere he has been. Everyone seems to be aware of this except you, like how nobody knew that JT Miller was gonna be signed to that dumbass contract, nor if he was gonna be traded, or what for, everything was rumours not tied to management, because management wasn't saying shit.
Same goes with this.
Precedent, which has more legs to it than "language" used by reporter to state rumour.Rutherfords not leaking things? What’s your proof?
Precedent based on your own conjecture? That’s compelling.Precedent, which has more legs to it than "language" used by reporter to state rumour.
Umm no precedent based on history, not only with the Canucks but with the Canes and Pens.Precedent based on your own conjecture? That’s compelling.
Umm no precedent based on history, not only with the Canucks but with the Canes and Pens.
Only conjecture here comes form you.
My opinion is grounded in precedent, created by history, yours is grounded in some stretch of an opinion based on language used to communicate a rumour. Where am I assuming?How is it not conjecture when you're making assumptions?
Your opinion is grounded in assumption.My opinion is grounded in precedent, created by history, yours is grounded in some stretch of an opinion based on language used to communicate a rumour. Where am I assuming?
No it's not, it's grounded in precedent, regardless, going in circles here, I'll agree to dissagree.Your opinion is grounded in assumption.
You can't prove a negative. Please take your petty squabble to PMs.Rutherfords not leaking things? What’s your proof?
When he was gm of the pens he leaked more than a mid century faucet. Can’t attest to his time with the Car though.Umm no precedent based on history, not only with the Canucks but with the Canes and Pens.
Only conjecture here comes from you.
Really? Hmm, I thought it was the opposite.When he was gm of the pens he leaked more than a mid century faucet. Can’t attest to his time with the Car though.
Boeser is the definition of great player who just needs a change of scenery and a fresh start.
For him right now it's mental. Even when he is at his worse he is a contributor.
I can think of multiple Canucks forwards who I am more disappointed with than Boeser this season.
Wtf? What part of MN HAS 15M in cap penalties in each of the next two years, do you not understand? MN should be the last place that Boeser goes to.Boeser for Duhaime.
I also think he is a bad fit with Boldy. I’d love a RHS sniper as would all Wild fans, but Boldy isn’t a burner and Boeser is just slow.Wtf? What part of MN HAS 15M in cap penalties in each of the next two years, do you not understand? MN should be the last place that Boeser goes to.
Yeah, Boldy needs someone who can stretch the ice. Would like to see Walker get a bit more time with him.I also think he is a bad fit with Boldy. I’d love a RHS sniper as would all Wild fans, but Boldy isn’t a burner and Boeser is just slow.
I would consider him paid at a second line rate given the time he signed the contract. First liners at this point are $8m plus.Man I sure hope that you can convince another NHL GM about this because basically Boeser looks lost out there and really isn't a very good top 6 winger in todays NHL and his cap hit really hurts.
The guy was resigned for 3 years at a first line rate and he simply hasn't been worth it.