Prairie Habs
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2010
- 11,991
- 12,430
What does that mean though. Just that he was not entertaining for the camera? He made an alliance, won very key immunities, worked his way from the bottom to the end and made the decision to vote his best friend and ally in the game. Hannah flip flopped which worked out very good in her favor. Adam had some key moves but near the end he kind of fell flat with Hannah making the swing votes for her game and making the actual decisions.
Regardless it was a great season, jut felt Ken didn't get much respek at the jury questions.
That these aren't as highly valued as they use to be. Back in the day challenge wins, being in a strong alliance, and hard work around camp were the three pillars of the game. Anything beyond basic strategy was seen as underhanded and punished. This is pretty much the mindset that Ken went in with.
As the game has progressed it has become a lot more about the strategic part of the game and Ken didn't seem to take much part in that until day 38. With the right jury and sitting next to the right people Ken very well could have won, even in season 32 he would have had a great shot with that cast. I couldn't imagine him winning a returning season or a really strong first time players season like this one or BvBvB 1 though.