Sandra is a 2 time winner. Proven to be the all time best player. Why would we be shocked to see her go through???
Honestly, I think you're using flawed logic. Even if she won twice, you can't base a survivor's game completely on results. If she only played once, we would all be saying she's an average winner, in the Sophie, Tina, Michelle tier.
No one would have ever said after her first time playing that she was the best ever,
so when people say she's the best, it's only because she won a 2nd time.
But if I had to pick survivors better than her, I'd easily have Kim, Tony, Parvati & Rob.
Winning is one thing, but it's not like she dominated heroes vs villains. What if Russell decided to eliminate her instead of Courtney ? She goes out pre-merge and no one talks about her.
You can't pick the best survivor player based entirely on results.
Someone like Kim wasn't in danger at any time in the game, not once.
He's less popular, but it's the same for Yul.
I'd really like to hear your argument for Sandra > Kim.