Sully catering to the lowest common denominator. Nothing to see here. Move along.
If they send Grigorenko back, it's because Ruff/Regier can't spot talent and rely on the same old players. If he doesn't earn his roster spot and they keep him up, in three months it'll be another example of entitlement, lack of accountability, and Regier mismanaging assets by burning a year of Grigorenko's ELC.
Lather, rinse, repeat. I hate being so cynical, but TBN's body of work dictates that one of those will be the narrative if things don't work out perfectly. And if they keep him and it works out, the narrative will be that Grigorenko gave them no choice to screw up. This coach and GM deserve criticism, but that rag rarely, if ever, pinpoints the actual reasons to criticize them.
Sullivan is making an assessment after watching him for half an hour in practice yesterday. He probably hasn't watched one game Grigorenko has played this year.I know it's poetic hyperbole, but I can't help but be excited reading praise like this.
The point about Hecht is a lot of BS criticism of the organization. They signed Hecht because it's irresponsible to go into a season with their center position looking like it did. Hecht in no way prevents Grigorenko from playing and the Sabres wouldn't play Grigorenko just because they 'had' to. He will stay if he impresses and he's getting the same opportunity to impress as he would otherwise, as it looks like he's beginning camp between Leino and Ott. Hecht and Grigorenko can both play wing as well, so there's no shortage of place to play these guys depending on how well they are able to perform.
Further, I don't get the impression that he's seen mcuh of Grigorenko himself or knows much about him -- or indeed really knows what he's talking about here.
As to the issue itself, I think one thing in favor of keeping Grigs is that he already played a lot of his Q season, so even if he ends up playing some games here on the 4th line or scratched (vs other games on the 3rd line and all games he's in on the PP), he wouldn't be missing much development time overall while he'd get the benefit of learning from the pros. That gives the Sabres flexibility as they shouldn't worry about scratching him or playing him on the 4th if he has some week-to-week struggles. He's already played a bit more than half of the Q reg season games he did last season and got another WJC in to boot.
I'm rooting for him to make it, which is different than saying he should make it. I want the Sabres to keep him up if he's good enough and I very much want him to be good enough, but if he isn't then he isn't. Sullivan's take, as expected, does nothing other than dumb down the conversation and refocus the standard vitriol against Ruff/front office before they've even made their decision. In other words, he's already indicated what his article 6 games into the season will be and it won't factor in how well Grigorenko actually played.
I couldn't have written a better article, it portrays exactly what's going to happen, and why Ruff needs to go.
<3
If sully is going to be on today, I almost want to call into WGR and ask him how many Quebec Ramparts games he's seen.
Leaf fan here.
My opinion on most prospects is that it can't hurt them to spend an extra year in junior, but it can hurt them to rush them.
Buffalo obviously isn't going to contend for the SC this year, it's kind of a transition season. I don't see why he should be rushed up. He's having a pretty dominant season right now, I think it'd be good for him to continue to do so and (hopefully) dominate the playoffs. NHL training camp can provide good exposure, and being "cut" from the team can also light a fire under him going into next year.
They can also point out specific parts of his game that they want him to work on, which is much easier to do and adjust at the junior level than in your rookie season as a 18 year old.
Grigorenko might end up being a ridiculous steal. Hodgson+Grig+Girgensons+Ott looks like it could be pretty solid longterm, definitely not happy to see it in the division
Every logical thought about Grigorenko has been made here already, but I want to know (seriously) what the best thing real fans can do to stick it to Bucky and Sully for their incessantly ignorant columns.
Can somebody start a blog or fan board that simply picks apart their drivel enough to gain widespread popularity? Is there a way to shift focus away from them and toward the team (or thoughtful discussion about the team) in the process, without giving them extra attention that they probably want anyway (even if it's negative)?
There's two sides of that argument, though. On the one hand, there's "Why burn a year of his ELC when the team won't be contending?", which is essentially your position. On the other hand, I think the argument could be made that now is precisely the time to break him in and get him used to the NHL, that way he'll have already experienced some of the growing pains when next season starts.
The way I see it is that the growing pains are inevitable, regardless of when he gets his first experience. Most Sabres fans don't have high expectations for the season--best case, IMO, is they finish 6th-8th and they play a tight 1st round series, thereby allowing some of the young guys to get more playoff experience--so why not get him some experience now. And "burning" a year of the ELC isn't as big of a deal now that Pegula is around and Buffalo has the wherewithal to re-sign its own stars.
Leaf fan here.
My opinion on most prospects is that it can't hurt them to spend an extra year in junior, but it can hurt them to rush them.
Buffalo obviously isn't going to contend for the SC this year, it's kind of a transition season. I don't see why he should be rushed up. He's having a pretty dominant season right now, I think it'd be good for him to continue to do so and (hopefully) dominate the playoffs. NHL training camp can provide good exposure, and being "cut" from the team can also light a fire under him going into next year.
They can also point out specific parts of his game that they want him to work on, which is much easier to do and adjust at the junior level than in your rookie season as a 18 year old.
Grigorenko might end up being a ridiculous steal. Hodgson+Grig+Girgensons+Ott looks like it could be pretty solid longterm, definitely not happy to see it in the division
Every logical thought about Grigorenko has been made here already, but I want to know (seriously) what the best thing real fans can do to stick it to Bucky and Sully for their incessantly ignorant columns.
Can somebody start a blog or fan board that simply picks apart their drivel enough to gain widespread popularity? Is there a way to shift focus away from them and toward the team (or thoughtful discussion about the team) in the process, without giving them extra attention that they probably want anyway (even if it's negative)?
A couple thoughts as I appreciate the input but don't really agree with your premise. For one, I think teams in transition are actually typically more likely to rush players than a team in contention, though that's not to say whether or not it is wise.
Not really worth the time and effort.
They are dinosaurs in a dying industry. The segment of the fan population that gets their sports opinion from newspaper columnists is rapidly decreasing. They speak to fewer people each day.
It will work itself out.
Give him the 5 games and see how he does, 5 games isn't going to ruin a players development.