Statistics Thread

Duchene2MacKinnon

In the hands of Genius
Aug 8, 2006
45,300
9,465
I mean, you can say whether the chance was good is subjective but there's nothing subjective about being the last person to pass the ball to someone before their shot. It's pretty cut and dry.

The same goes for assists. It's not subjective; if you are the last person in control of the ball before the person that scores, and the opposition doesn't gain control inbetween (I believe except for saves/posts) then it's an assist. Pretty straightforward.
LOL I mean how can anyone with a straight face say a 30 yard shot that goes way over the goal is a chance get real. I cant even believe this is an argument tbh.

Yes, it's a hockey assist but not necessarily counted every time in soccer.



Here Busquets was the last player to touch the ball before Messi. Did he create the chance?
 

Cassano

Registered User
Aug 31, 2013
25,610
3,818
GTA
Yes, which stresses the point that it's far from a revealing stat.
If you continue to send great passes to your striker who never one times it but on the contrary fails to control the ball repeatedly, you're doing great but it's not showing.
Indeed which is why KdB would have like 300 chances created this season it we took that into account. :D
 

Duchene2MacKinnon

In the hands of Genius
Aug 8, 2006
45,300
9,465
That doesn’t make it subjective. It’s cut and dry on what the stat exactly is.

Now to argue on its usefulness, that can definitely be debated.
Hence why the "chance" is subjective. It's a chance created who defines a chance like that... nobody.
 

YNWA14

Onbreekbaar
Dec 29, 2010
34,543
2,560
LOL I mean how can anyone with a straight face say a 30 yard shot that goes way over the goal is a chance get real. I cant even believe this is an argument tbh.

Because what you're ignorantly doing is looking at the outcome as opposed to the process. Do players score from 30 yard shots? Do you understand what 'chance' means?

Here Busquets was the last player to touch the ball before Messi. Did he create the chance?

If Busquets was not there could Messi have done that? Nobody is putting a weight on this value, but he was certainly important in that play still. Nobody is saying to take stats as the be all end all either, they're meant to be supplementary and provide insight.
 

Duchene2MacKinnon

In the hands of Genius
Aug 8, 2006
45,300
9,465
Because what you're ignorantly doing is looking at the outcome as opposed to the process. Do players score from 30 yard shots?Do you understand what 'chance' means?



If Busquets was not there could Messi have done that? Nobody is putting a weight on this value, but he was certainly important in that play still. Nobody is saying to take stats as the be all end all either, they're meant to be supplementary and provide insight.

Nope not at all. You got me.

Literally the stupidest take. Enjoy thinking Willian is the 3rd best chance creator. Same as that guy who tried to convince Ozil was the best play maker of all time.
 

YNWA14

Onbreekbaar
Dec 29, 2010
34,543
2,560
Nope not at all. You got me.

Literally the stupidest take. Enjoy thinking Willian is the 3rd best chance creator. Same as that guy who tried to convince Ozil was the best play maker of all time.
Nobody here thinks Willian is the '3rd best' chance creator. What's stupid is you arguing something is subjective or saying something isn't a chance when there are plenty of examples that define it exactly as that, then having the gall to try and talk down to others about it.

There's plenty better statistics that help break down the quality of these chances, but that's not what this is about.
 

Duchene2MacKinnon

In the hands of Genius
Aug 8, 2006
45,300
9,465
Nobody here thinks Willian is the '3rd best' chance creator. What's stupid is you arguing something is subjective or saying something isn't a chance when there are plenty of examples that define it exactly as that, then having the gall to try and talk down to others about it.

There's plenty better statistics that help break down the quality of these chances, but that's not what this is about.
A) it is subjective and B) a 30 yard shot well over the goal is not a chance. But yeah, I couldnt care less about this. I said it in passing but it dragged on. Take care.
 

YNWA14

Onbreekbaar
Dec 29, 2010
34,543
2,560
A) it is subjective and B) a 30 yard shot well over the goal is not a chance. But yeah, I couldnt care less about this. I said it in passing but it dragged on. Take care.
The outcome of the shot is a miss, but shooting from 30 yards out is what is the chance, not the outcome. It's really not difficult to understand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cassano

Blender

Registered User
Dec 2, 2009
51,399
45,290
That tweet is incredibly misleading. For one it's showing key pass stats but calling them "chances created", and secondly it's not a ranking of the top 6 players, it's the top player in key passes from the 6 teams indicated, which aren't even the top 6.

Pepe is 34th in the league in key passes, Fred is 44th for example.

https://www.whoscored.com/Regions/2...erStatistics/England-Premier-League-2019-2020

upload_2020-8-11_11-0-15.png


upload_2020-8-11_11-0-30.png


upload_2020-8-11_11-0-46.png


upload_2020-8-11_11-0-58.png


upload_2020-8-11_11-1-9.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: YNWA14

Duchene2MacKinnon

In the hands of Genius
Aug 8, 2006
45,300
9,465
The outcome of the shot is a miss, but shooting from 30 yards out is what is the chance, not the outcome. It's really not difficult to understand.

Hoofing the ball 40 feet in the air is never a chance. Even you can comprehend that one. But like I said I don't really care what you define as a chance or about that "stat"
 

YNWA14

Onbreekbaar
Dec 29, 2010
34,543
2,560
Hoofing the ball 40 feet in the air is never a chance. Even you can comprehend that one. But like I said I don't really care what you define as a chance or about that "stat"
You still just don't get it. It has nothing to do with where the ball ends up, nor does it have anything to do with 'my definition'.
 

YNWA14

Onbreekbaar
Dec 29, 2010
34,543
2,560
That tweet is incredibly misleading. For one it's showing key pass stats but calling them "chances created", and secondly it's not a ranking of the top 6 players, it's the top player in key passes from the 6 teams indicated, which aren't even the top 6.

Pepe is 34th in the league in key passes, Fred is 44th for example.

https://www.whoscored.com/Regions/2...erStatistics/England-Premier-League-2019-2020

View attachment 360017

View attachment 360018

View attachment 360019

View attachment 360020

View attachment 360021
That's because Pepe and Fred suck.
 

Blender

Registered User
Dec 2, 2009
51,399
45,290
A) it is subjective and B) a 30 yard shot well over the goal is not a chance. But yeah, I couldnt care less about this. I said it in passing but it dragged on. Take care.
The stat in that tweet is key passes, and is defined as a pass (or cross) that leads to a shot. It's as objective as counting shots in the game, and if the key pass stat isn't valid than neither is the shot stats you see in a game.
 

YNWA14

Onbreekbaar
Dec 29, 2010
34,543
2,560
Mahrez being tied at 2nd isn't surprising either, there is an argument to be made that he's City's 2nd best player.
I agree. He also played almost 900 fewer minutes than KdB in the league also (the equivalent of 10 games), though even with that time it seems unlikely that he'd close the gap.
 

Stray Wasp

Registered User
May 5, 2009
4,561
1,503
South east London
Yes, which stresses the point that it's far from a revealing stat.
If you continue to send great passes to your striker who never one times it but on the contrary fails to control the ball repeatedly, you're doing great but it's not showing.

I don't seek out statistical insights, so I'm ignorant of what categories have been studied, but your post crystallised for me the point that none of the data in this thread touches on an essential part of the game - movement off the ball.

This feeds into the earlier debate about 'assists' and 'chances created'.

To use an example that occurred to me for obvious reasons:



In classical terms, the above is an 'individual goal'. However, as the co-commentator (who I won't name because he's in my bad books and I'm happy to be that petty) points out, although Craig Bellamy doesn't touch the ball, his immaculately-timed, precisely-angled run makes a crucial contribution to opening up space for a far slower team mate to move in on goal.

You can lambast the defending, obviously, but creating space is a priceless attribute and I recently happened upon another 'solo' goal to which Bellamy made a similar contribution.

Asking all contributors rather than Evilo specifically, has any attempt been made to find a way of charting what might be called 'off the ball assists'?
 

Stray Wasp

Registered User
May 5, 2009
4,561
1,503
South east London
Likewise, a couple other things that would be really interesting if they haven't already been quantified would be a stat for blown defensive coverages (for midfielders as much as defenders), and a 'missed creative option' stat, to capture instances where a player doesn't see a pass that would either put a team mate into space or switch the play from the congested side of the field to the opposite side, where the subsequent pass would release someone.

I wonder, too, whether a stat could be attempted along the lines of 'expected offsides', to try and distinguish between moments when the offside player is a victim of circumstances (eg a teammate's ill-timed release, a rapid change of direction in the play that no human could reasonably react to), and instances or sheer carelessness (eg. the many strikers I've spent years screaming 'stay onside, for f***'s sake' at).

If these things exist, someone please let me know.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad