That’s still a chance created from the definition of the stat.Like I said a player shooting aimlessly from 30 yards out would be a "chance" this happens regularly in a game. It's not an actual missed opportunity to score.
That’s still a chance created from the definition of the stat.Like I said a player shooting aimlessly from 30 yards out would be a "chance" this happens regularly in a game. It's not an actual missed opportunity to score.
LOL I mean how can anyone with a straight face say a 30 yard shot that goes way over the goal is a chance get real. I cant even believe this is an argument tbh.I mean, you can say whether the chance was good is subjective but there's nothing subjective about being the last person to pass the ball to someone before their shot. It's pretty cut and dry.
The same goes for assists. It's not subjective; if you are the last person in control of the ball before the person that scores, and the opposition doesn't gain control inbetween (I believe except for saves/posts) then it's an assist. Pretty straightforward.
Yes, but not from the definition of this chances created stat.But you can create chances that don't result into shots too.
Which is why it's subjective and pretty stupid.That’s still a chance created from the definition of the stat.
Yes, which stresses the point that it's far from a revealing stat.Yes, but not from the definition of this chances created stat.
That doesn’t make it subjective. It’s cut and dry on what the stat exactly is.Which is why it's subjective and pretty stupid.
Indeed which is why KdB would have like 300 chances created this season it we took that into account.Yes, which stresses the point that it's far from a revealing stat.
If you continue to send great passes to your striker who never one times it but on the contrary fails to control the ball repeatedly, you're doing great but it's not showing.
Hence why the "chance" is subjective. It's a chance created who defines a chance like that... nobody.That doesn’t make it subjective. It’s cut and dry on what the stat exactly is.
Now to argue on its usefulness, that can definitely be debated.
LOL I mean how can anyone with a straight face say a 30 yard shot that goes way over the goal is a chance get real. I cant even believe this is an argument tbh.
Here Busquets was the last player to touch the ball before Messi. Did he create the chance?
Because what you're ignorantly doing is looking at the outcome as opposed to the process. Do players score from 30 yard shots?Do you understand what 'chance' means?
If Busquets was not there could Messi have done that? Nobody is putting a weight on this value, but he was certainly important in that play still. Nobody is saying to take stats as the be all end all either, they're meant to be supplementary and provide insight.
Nobody here thinks Willian is the '3rd best' chance creator. What's stupid is you arguing something is subjective or saying something isn't a chance when there are plenty of examples that define it exactly as that, then having the gall to try and talk down to others about it.Nope not at all. You got me.
Literally the stupidest take. Enjoy thinking Willian is the 3rd best chance creator. Same as that guy who tried to convince Ozil was the best play maker of all time.
A) it is subjective and B) a 30 yard shot well over the goal is not a chance. But yeah, I couldnt care less about this. I said it in passing but it dragged on. Take care.Nobody here thinks Willian is the '3rd best' chance creator. What's stupid is you arguing something is subjective or saying something isn't a chance when there are plenty of examples that define it exactly as that, then having the gall to try and talk down to others about it.
There's plenty better statistics that help break down the quality of these chances, but that's not what this is about.
The outcome of the shot is a miss, but shooting from 30 yards out is what is the chance, not the outcome. It's really not difficult to understand.A) it is subjective and B) a 30 yard shot well over the goal is not a chance. But yeah, I couldnt care less about this. I said it in passing but it dragged on. Take care.
The outcome of the shot is a miss, but shooting from 30 yards out is what is the chance, not the outcome. It's really not difficult to understand.
This is not kind on Arsenal, Spurs or United.
You still just don't get it. It has nothing to do with where the ball ends up, nor does it have anything to do with 'my definition'.Hoofing the ball 40 feet in the air is never a chance. Even you can comprehend that one. But like I said I don't really care what you define as a chance or about that "stat"
That's because Pepe and Fred suck.That tweet is incredibly misleading. For one it's showing key pass stats but calling them "chances created", and secondly it's not a ranking of the top 6 players, it's the top player in key passes from the 6 teams indicated, which aren't even the top 6.
Pepe is 34th in the league in key passes, Fred is 44th for example.
https://www.whoscored.com/Regions/2...erStatistics/England-Premier-League-2019-2020
View attachment 360017
View attachment 360018
View attachment 360019
View attachment 360020
View attachment 360021
The stat in that tweet is key passes, and is defined as a pass (or cross) that leads to a shot. It's as objective as counting shots in the game, and if the key pass stat isn't valid than neither is the shot stats you see in a game.A) it is subjective and B) a 30 yard shot well over the goal is not a chance. But yeah, I couldnt care less about this. I said it in passing but it dragged on. Take care.
I guess all Liverpool midfielders suck then.That's because Pepe and Fred suck.
Mahrez being tied at 2nd isn't surprising either, there is an argument to be made that he's City's 2nd best player.Premier League Player Stats - Big chances created
This is the one that actually matters, grading the quality of the chance based on it actually being good. Henderson is quite high on this list btw, but the top two are not surprising.
I agree. He also played almost 900 fewer minutes than KdB in the league also (the equivalent of 10 games), though even with that time it seems unlikely that he'd close the gap.Mahrez being tied at 2nd isn't surprising either, there is an argument to be made that he's City's 2nd best player.
Yes, which stresses the point that it's far from a revealing stat.
If you continue to send great passes to your striker who never one times it but on the contrary fails to control the ball repeatedly, you're doing great but it's not showing.