Dennis Bonvie
Registered User
The Bruins had been in the National Hockey league for 50 years before Mr. Jacobs bought the team, 47 years ago. Jacob's ownership is almost half of that history. It's not like he's run the team into the ground.We have discussed this matter multiple times before and I see no need to rehash it. I respect your opinion on it but we disagree, which is fine.
But just specifically on the ownership, yeah of course the Bruins are literally Jacobs' property. Such is the American private capitalist model in sport and while I don't particularly like it it's what you have. But I would argue that there are different ways of approaching that, and I would say that the best and most appropriate way to treat a sporting franchise, especially one with the history, importance and emotional attachments of the Bruins, is as a custodian. You are caring for the organization, looking after it on behalf of its fans and ensuring its health and integrity for future generations. On top of that I would say that you have an obligation to the STHs in particular who invest a lot of time and money in the franchise, to keep them informed, engaged in and, at least broadly speaking, satisfied with the direction the team is heading in. That means speaking regularly through the media or directly to the fans in keeping them abreast of what's happening, and why, of having some sense of accountability for actions taken and appreciating supporter concerns and points of view.
And I just don't believe that the Jacobs and their acolytes do anywhere near enough of this, and that their attitude in owning the club is too lofty, imperial and money-driven. It's not terrible and they do some things well, but it could be a lot better. But that's just me.
Last edited: