Management STATE OF THE BRUINS - 10/10/22 - video and transcript

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
68,981
99,752
Cambridge, MA
BOSTON BRUINS CEO CHARLIE JACOBS, BOSTON BRUINS PRESIDENT CAM NEELY, BOSTON BRUINS GENERAL MANAGER DON SWEENEY AND BOSTON BRUINS HEAD COACH JIM MONTGOMERY…



On a contract with Anton Stralman and today’s waivers…

Sweeney: “The two o’clock waiver stuff is part of the exercise we’ve been dealing with in talking with Anton, he’s obviously had a good camp and has been a welcome addition to our group. Speaking for Jim and the conversations we’ve had with Monty is that he’s comfortable with him and would add to our group, we just have been waiting to look at our roster and see what we’re going to do. I’ve been communicating with Anton and Marc Levine all the way along and plan to speak with him again today."

On the back end without Charlie McAvoy going into the season…


Sweeney: “Not as good. Obviously, he’s a unique player and we miss him. Hopefully he gets back as quickly as possible. The other guys have all played for us and have played important roles and minutes, but that gets expanded when you’re talking about a player that plays an excess of 22 to 23 minutes a night in all situations. You know, our whole team is going to have to recognize that we have to be good and it’s no different than having Brad [Marchand] out in that regard. The good news is that Matt Grzelcyk’s made a lot of progress and medically he’s in a good spot and now it’s just a matter of when he feels comfortable and Monty feels comfortable putting him in.”

On the discussions he’s had with the guys on waivers…

Montgomery: “Yeah, I like to communicate to everybody what we think is going to transpire and there’s a lot of uncertainty. I was just more talking to him [Chris Wagner] mentally, with him being on waivers and the 2 o’clock window. I appreciate him being a pro and I don’t have any answers for him at the moment, like I don’t have any answers for you guys.
On if he talked to each of the three players…

Montgomery: “I did.”

On the power play with Taylor Hall back in the mix…

Montgomery: “We have to discuss that as a staff, but because of [Jake] DeBrusk’s ability to create shots on his own and make a lot of plays from the half wall, the thought right now would be [Taylor] Hall going on the first unit and DeBrusk running the second unit from the half wall.”

On how a contract negotiation with a player like Pastrnak would change once the season begins…

Sweeney: “Well, both sides have been open about continuing our talks. So, I don’t think things change at all from that standpoint, unless David takes a different position, but up until this point we’ve been communicating regularly and when he feels comfortable, hopefully we finalize a deal. There isn’t any timeline on that, but we’re going to have to communicate almost every day — to tell you the honest truth, and see if we can find the finish line.”

On appreciation for Pastrnak and his role in the organization…

Jacobs: “Well, David is a special player. We try not to comment about ongoing negotiations, but David is obviously a special player. Ownership is aware that we need to be aggressive in trying to re-up David to a new contract. To that end, Sweens and Cam have been working on that.”

On if he has a starting goaltender for Opening Night…

Montgomery: “No, I don’t.”

On if he believes this team will be a contender this year…

Sweeney: “Yeah, I like our group. It’s a two-fold issue for us, we have to get healthy and stay healthy, which is a challenge in the National Hockey League to begin with, but if fully healthy I think our group is deep. Performance will be dictated, and health will be a factor of it, but I like how our group has come together overall, I like the balance, but again the players have to go out and perform to what we think our expectations are. We’re going to be a highly-competitive team; we expect to be there at the end and challenge. A lot of things have to go right, once you get in, but you have to get in and make sure you earn that right.”

On what they want to see out of the Bruins this year…

Jacobs: “I try to leave the style of play and team performance to management here. I do feel we left some opportunity on the table last year in the playoffs. It stinks when you lose Game 7 by a goal and you may have watched the game and felt the outcome might have been differently, but it was time for us to turn the page and I expect that when speaking with Monty and with others here that we have a very competitive team that I think, frankly, a lot of people don’t expect. We have a more offensive team than perhaps maybe in years past, and that’s saying a lot considering we won 51 games last year. I think Cam should probably chime in on this one.”

Neely: “Well from my perspective, I want us to compete every night, that’s first and foremost. I think from a skill perspective throughout the lineup, especially in the forward group, I think we’re pretty deep, but for me it’s really just about competing every night. I say this to our players all the time, you may not play well every night, but you can sure as hell compete every night. So, that’s what I expect and with the core group we have and have had for quite some time, the expectations of that are in that locker room. So, for me it’s really about not seeing any nights off, like I said you may not play well, but you can certainly compete.”

On his sense for the League right now…

Jacobs: “You know it’s funny, as the restrictions were lifted — and I’ll speak specifically to Boston — I feel like there was a bit of a feeling-out period for a lot of our fan base just about whether they were comfortable coming into TD Garden, regardless of what the restrictions were from the city or state. We have begun to level set, in terms of whether those people that weren’t comfortable have either moved on, sold their tickets, or decided to come back in and find some comfort in attending a game in person. Hockey, unlike most major sports, is really gate-driven, so it’s important for us to get our fans in the building and this will be our first year, I believe, or dare I say… I won’t say back to normal, but this is perhaps the next normal that we will experience here in 2022-23.”

On if he feels other teams around the League are in similar positions…

Jacobs: “It’s difficult for me to discuss other markets without getting in trouble with headquarters, so I’ll just say this. Any indications for anything from travel to hospitality to restaurant business seems to be coming back online, and I use this term again, coming back to the “next normal.”

On the way Sweeney handled his job last season…

Neely: “Well, the narrative, quite frankly, is a little frustrating to me. I mean we’ve said it many times from a draft perspective, we have missed on the high side, especially in 2015 and I’m tired of talking about 2015. But if you look at who the Boston Bruins have drafted, say from maybe 2015 to 2018 — it may be a little unfair to look at players from 2019 through 2021 in their development stage — but if you look at the players the Boston Bruins have drafted and how many NHL games they’ve played, I think it’s amongst some of the highest in the league. So, the narrative is a little old for me. Every GM in the league makes mistakes and we’re going to continue to make mistakes, but hopefully we learn from those mistakes and limit those mistakes. I think that Don has certainly evolved over the last few years and our scouting staff has evolved. We certainly have high expectations and high standards, but mistakes are going to happen, but I don’t think it’s as bad as the narrative is out there.”

On Bergeron’s role so far this season…

Montgomery: “I mean it’s just continued. Every situation that he and I talk about, he’s always looking at it about how it’s going to impact the team and how it impacts those individuals. Not himself, but the team. So, that’s a coach’s mindset is always what can we do that’s best for the team and that’s his mindset.”

On if this will be Bergeron’s last season…

Neely: “Well, it is always up to Patrice, so we’ll see how the season goes for him. I know he’s taken it year by year, and we’re thrilled to have him back this year and we’re going to focus on this year with him.”

Sweeney: “Patrice would be the only one that could add to that and he’s been pretty clear that he’s taking things year by year.”

On Patrice Bergeron…

Jacobs: “I can only speak to Patrice because he’s the only player I’ve had regular interaction with. But I will tell you that I remember the day we drafted Patrice. I’ve seen him develop into a five-time Selke winner. We’re so fortunate to have him on the ice as a Boston Bruin. I was just reflecting on how quickly the years passed, and I don't mean to sound nostalgic, but I also want to impress upon our roster that this is a real opportunity for our players to have a year with Patrice on the ice, our younger players, in particular, to learn from him and to be a teammate. As someone in your group alluded to, maybe having a coach on the ice and, to a certain extent, that’s what Patrice is doing. He’s teaching our next generation of Boston Bruins players how to be Bruins, and that's invaluable.”

On Jeremy Jacobs…

Jacobs: “The Chairman is well. He’s quite active, as any 82-year-old would be. He sends his regards, he’s doing well. He’s still a Chairman in the National Hockey League, I’m going to be with him on Monday, next week, at board meetings in New York City, talking about the economics and different policies. He’s still quite on his feet and still quite active, just not here today. Just some personal matters with our family, he couldn't arrive today.”

On what this team has that it didn’t last year…

Neely: “I think upfront, we have a little bit more versatility. We bring in [Pavel] Zacha, who can play the wing and center. We always are concerned about injuries, so we feel if we have some injuries down the middle of the ice that he could slide in there and help contribute on the offensive part, we may not miss as much. Certainly, when you have Bergy and Krech, who are top centermen in the game, that helps control the offense. We have an opportunity to slide Zacha in there. It gives our coaching staff a little bit more flexibility with our lineup. We’re still tinkering, I think Monty can attest to this, we’re still tinkering with the bottom part of our lineup. I think we have a really solid top nine, and it’s just a matter of what flavor we want for the fourth line. Then, on the back end, with Griz out and Charlie out, it certainly leaves a little bit of a hole there to start the year. But I think our guys are really excited about the opportunity that some of these young players have to step up and get a little bit more minutes in different situations than they normally have. We’re anxious to see how that plays out. From a healthy lineup perspective, we’re fairly deep. I’m excited about this roster. Obviously, to your point, it’s a little challenging at times to watch the preseason games when the coaching staff is trying to figure out who we’ve got. Monty’s new, he’s trying to understand the players and their personalities. I’m excited about getting going, I think our players are really excited about this team. Talking with the guys that have been around here a long time, there’s a really special feeling in that locker room right now, and it’s encouraging for me to see. I think these guys feel like something special can happen this year.”

On inside ice...

Neely: “You look at a guy like AJ [Greer], who kind of surprised some of us. We kind of knew what motor he has and what he’d bring. There’s a guy who’s not afraid of getting inside ice. Lauko, he’s shown that he’s certainly not afraid. Freddy, although he didn’t have the camp that he wanted, that we wanted, he’s the kind of guy that can certainly get inside ice. Charlie Coyle — so we’ve got guys, they know the expectations, playing perimeter hockey is not winning hockey. These guys understand that.”

On the situation if players clear waivers…

Sweeney: “We’ll be compliant. We’ve got options after we put our roster in, but those guys were an unfortunate part of the dynamic of both cap and roster limitations that you have and creating flexibility with how you want to shape your roster, the decisions that Monty and his staff would like to make for opening night and utilizing, really everybody up and down the entire roster. We saw Lauko practicing today. Those finalizations will be made, but we have no issues once 2:00 p.m. comes along, what we can do to be compliant.”

On if Grzelcyk will start on long-term…

Sweeney: “No.”

On if Pastrnak will consider roster construction for his contract…

Neely: “Yeah, for sure. Obviously, a shot-first winger certainly wants to know who his centerman is going to be. We’ve made it very clear to David that we’re very aware of that particular position moving forward and we’re going to do everything we possibly can to fill that void when that happens. I think that he also sees that we signed Charlie McAvoy long-term, we signed two good goaltenders that are with us, we got Lindholm long-term, Taylor Hall is here for a few more years, we got Brad Marchand for a couple more years. So, we’re not stripping it down by any means. I think he’s certainly been told that, and he recognizes that, and he knows that we’re in a good position this year. We’re here to show everybody that we're not stripping this thing down. We’re going to continue to build on it.”

On if he thinks a team is better off with a clear No. 1 goaltender…

Montgomery: “The Bruins have had tremendous success both ways. I think a lot of credit has to go to Bob Essensa. He’s done a great job developing the relationship with the goalies, making sure that the Bruins get excellent goaltending throughout the regular season to be able to have the opportunity to get in the playoffs. I think everyone would say, ideally, you have a number one by the time you get into the playoffs and after the trade deadline. That’s up to one of those two goaltenders to emerge ahead of the other. In today’s NHL, to have success in the regular season, with as many threes and fours as you have. You have to have two goalies that can do the job night in and night out.”

On if it’s fair to view this season as one last run with this group…

Neely: “I think it’s very fair. We talked about earlier with Bergy — it’s really up to him, and I think with Krejci the same way. These guys have had long, successful careers. Like I said, I think this group in the locker room feels like something special can happen this year. It’s a close team, and when I say team, it’s a real team. I think their teammates look at this and say this might be the last year we have the ability to play with these guys, so let's take as much advantage as we can. That's the feeling I get inside the locker room.”

On if being crowded on the left side is a good problem…

Sweeney: “It could be all of the above, to be honest with you. Where we start right now without having those guys makes you feel like you need. You go through defensemen throughout the course of the season. You just have guys that can step in and play minutes in all different situations, which we currently have, and we’re better off when we do. Clearly, the decisions we made yesterday give us potentially more flexibility in really any way. Whether that's moving guys around the roster or whether that’s to utilize cap space. They’re both really important, and again it's not an easy conversation to have with players by any means. But it’s just the nature of some of the things that we have to deal with. Putting the roster together when you’re teetering on guys that are ready to come back as opposed to guys that it’s an unknown, these guys are all ready to come back within a shorter period of time. They're not out for the whole season, where some teams can plan accordingly in that regard. We’re fortunate in that regard because they're good players.”
 

The National

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2017
29,112
31,730
Los Angeles
So is talking about a topic for 7 years and then ripping a guy for being tired of talking about it for 7 years.

Montgomery is a breath of fresh air though. Sounds exactly as advertised
I agree I’m tired of it too but the guy never speaks to the media how can he be tired of anything?

And he sort of fueled the conversation again by bringing it up unprompted.
 

Aussie Bruin

Registered User
Sponsor
Aug 3, 2019
9,947
22,131
Victoria, Aus
So what I'm hearing is:

October_3rd_1972.png


Just kidding, although this crew really does like to waffle on while saying not much. Main thing is, I'm ready for another season!
 

Aussie Bruin

Registered User
Sponsor
Aug 3, 2019
9,947
22,131
Victoria, Aus
I agree I’m tired of it too but the guy never speaks to the media how can he be tired of anything?

And he sort of fueled the conversation again by bringing it up unprompted.

Neely's super-defensive and I think still nervous whenever he fronts the media, so he has this habit of putting his foot in it and 'protesting too much'. Think it just stems from him being uncomfortable with this side of things, but it's part of his job.
 

The National

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2017
29,112
31,730
Los Angeles
Neely's super-defensive and I think still nervous whenever he fronts the media, so he has this habit of putting his foot in it and 'protesting too much'. Think it just stems from him being uncomfortable with this side of things, but it's part of his job.
Yeah he’s an emotional guy I get it but it is part of his job, take some media training for the 3 times a year you speak to the media if you can’t handle it.

It has trickled down to Don too though, who I think is fairly good with the media and deflecting questions nicely. But pretty much every team in town has a FO member do a weekly radio spot, except the Bruins. Which I’m fine with but don’t act like you’re exhausted with questions when you don’t really have to face many of them.
 

Aussie Bruin

Registered User
Sponsor
Aug 3, 2019
9,947
22,131
Victoria, Aus
Yeah he’s an emotional guy I get it but it is part of his job, take some media training for the 3 times a year you speak to the media if you can’t handle it.

It has trickled down to Don too though, who I think is fairly good with the media and deflecting questions nicely. But pretty much every team in town has a FO member do a weekly radio spot, except the Bruins. Which I’m fine with but don’t act like you’re exhausted with questions when you don’t really have to face many of them.

Agreed. But I think it comes back to the fact that the Jacobs and by extension their senior management treat the Bruins as their own personal property, and we the fans just have the privilege to watch and spend money on it. They don't see themselves as accountable to anybody.
 
  • Love
Reactions: BMC and Gordoff

rocketdan9

Registered User
Feb 5, 2009
20,411
13,210
Don states the team will be cap compliant (even if the vets clear waivers)... no details provided
 

PatriceBergeronFan

Registered User
Jul 15, 2011
59,751
37,407
USA
Yeah he’s an emotional guy I get it but it is part of his job, take some media training for the 3 times a year you speak to the media if you can’t handle it.

It has trickled down to Don too though, who I think is fairly good with the media and deflecting questions nicely. But pretty much every team in town has a FO member do a weekly radio spot, except the Bruins. Which I’m fine with but don’t act like you’re exhausted with questions when you don’t really have to face many of them.

Neely is defensive and Don acts as though he is above any questioning. Neither drives confidence.
 

Alicat

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 26, 2005
87,861
97,937
Boston
Hilarious that Pasta still doesn’t feel comfortable signing.

No long term contract talks with our shut down defenseman? Did I read that one right?
McAvoy, Lindholm and Carlo are all locked up and Gryz has 2 years left on his deal so not sure what D man you're talking about.

As for Pasta, I'm not worried. I got better shit to worry about. it will get done when it gets done.
 

LouJersey

Registered User
Jun 29, 2002
68,265
42,282
Graves to Gardens
youtu.be
McAvoy, Lindholm and Carlo are all locked up and Gryz has 2 years left on his deal so not sure what D man you're talking about.

As for Pasta, I'm not worried. I got better shit to worry about. it will get done when it gets done.
Yeah whether he signs or not doesn’t mean anything to my life either, but message board wise it’s kinda a big deal. Sounds like the holdup is Pasta and wanting to re up with a team with no top
Centers prospects in the pipeline and looking like minimal cap space next year to attract one.

The Gryz thing was weird I’m guessing it was injured long term?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
29,459
17,889
Connecticut
Agreed. But I think it comes back to the fact that the Jacobs and by extension their senior management treat the Bruins as their own personal property, and we the fans just have the privilege to watch and spend money on it. They don't see themselves as accountable to anybody.

I'm going to have to disagree with this assessment.

Although, considering Jacobs is the owner of the Bruins, it is conceivable he treats them as his own personal property.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bwunderlich

chizzler

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 11, 2006
13,260
6,317
Neely's super-defensive and I think still nervous whenever he fronts the media, so he has this habit of putting his foot in it and 'protesting too much'. Think it just stems from him being uncomfortable with this side of things, but it's part of his job.
Yeah he’s an emotional guy I get it but it is part of his job, take some media training for the 3 times a year you speak to the media if you can’t handle it.

It has trickled down to Don too though, who I think is fairly good with the media and deflecting questions nicely. But pretty much every team in town has a FO member do a weekly radio spot, except the Bruins. Which I’m fine with but don’t act like you’re exhausted with questions when you don’t really have to face many of them.
Don’t kid yourselves. Nobody from all four teams in this town tell anybody anything if it afecta players or the team. Fans want to know everything and want GM’s to give up their cards. That’s not how it works. People seem to be clinging to Cam telling Felger to f*** himself as a bad thing. Felger is a putz and just antagonizes for ratings. I’m not a fan of Sweeney but I to get sick of hearing about the f***en draft of 2015. f***!!!
 

The National

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2017
29,112
31,730
Los Angeles
Don’t kid yourselves. Nobody from all four teams in this town tell anybody anything if it afecta players or the team. Fans want to know everything and want GM’s to give up their cards. That’s not how it works. People seem to be clinging to Cam telling Felger to f*** himself as a bad thing. Felger is a putz and just antagonizes for ratings. I’m not a fan of Sweeney but I to get sick of hearing about the f***en draft of 2015. f***!!!
I don’t care that he doesn’t say anything, I don’t expect him to, but I also don’t expect him to act tired of answering a question on a topic he’s maybe talked about twice because he’s in hiding.

And again I’m tired of it too and have no interest in discussing it any more than already have a zillion times but him bringing it up unprompted just further fuels the conversation and anger about it.
 

MattFromFranklin

Fire Sweeney and Neely
Jun 19, 2012
4,138
3,072
Franklin, MA
For a guy who generally hides from the media, being tired of talking about any topic is pretty hilarious.
I remember back in 2016 when F&M held his feet to the fire for all of the asinine trades, FA signings, and draft picks that Neely either green lit or happened under his watch. He got so sensitive that he swore on the air. He got his poor little feelings hurt.

There are a few problems with Neely as far as I'm concerned. First, he doesn't appear to be the greatest talent evaluator. Second, he comes off as way too sensitive and emotional for his current position. Third, it appears he's bending over backwards to defend a guy who he used to play with and has been friends with for years. Hello, nepotism.

So is talking about a topic for 7 years and then ripping a guy for being tired of talking about it for 7 years.
The problem is that the abomination that was the 1st round of the 2015 draft is still very much relevant to the current state of the franchise and their uncertain, if not bleak future. They had 2 studs (Barzal and Connor) fall into their lap because of how deep the draft was and decided to reach for 2 vastly inferior players (DeBrusk and Senyshyn) at the time - who are still vastly inferior 7 years later. A 10 year old with no hockey knowledge could've been handed a draft guide 5 minutes before the Bruins were on the clock and made better selections.

Sweeney and Neely butchered the re-tool in 2015 and 2016.

-Reportedly turned down "much higher firsts" than 15th overall for Hamilton
-2015 1st round
-Beleskey
-Hayes
-Overpaid McQuaid when they had a younger/cheaper version of him (Kevan Miller) already on the roster
-Gave up a 3rd round pick for Rinaldo
-Not trading Eriksson
-Wasted draft picks at the 2016 deadline
-Backes
-Wasted a 1st round pick on a 3rd/4th line grinder because he had "jam", whatever the hell that means
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMC and Gordoff

22Brad Park

Registered User
Nov 23, 2008
45,817
23,971
Calgary AB
That was closest I seen anyone talk about 2015 draft that way when Neely said all GMs make mistakes.

I remember back in 2016 when F&M held his feet to the fire for all of the asinine trades, FA signings, and draft picks that Neely either green lit or happened under his watch. He got so sensitive that he swore on the air. He got his poor little feelings hurt.

There are a few problems with Neely as far as I'm concerned. First, he doesn't appear to be the greatest talent evaluator. Second, he comes off as way too sensitive and emotional for his current position. Third, it appears he's bending over backwards to defend a guy who he used to play with and has been friends with for years. Hello, nepotism.


The problem is that the abomination that was the 1st round of the 2015 draft is still very much relevant to the current state of the franchise and their uncertain, if not bleak future. They had 2 studs (Barzal and Connor) fall into their lap because of how deep the draft was and decided to reach for 2 vastly inferior players (DeBrusk and Senyshyn) at the time - who are still vastly inferior 7 years later. A 10 year old with no hockey knowledge could've been handed a draft guide 5 minutes before the Bruins were on the clock and made better selections.

Sweeney and Neely butchered the re-tool in 2015 and 2016.

-Reportedly turned down "much higher firsts" than 15th overall for Hamilton
-2015 1st round
-Beleskey
-Hayes
-Overpaid McQuaid when they had a younger/cheaper version of him (Kevan Miller) already on the roster
-Gave up a 3rd round pick for Rinaldo
-Not trading Eriksson
-Wasted draft picks at the 2016 deadline
-Backes
-Wasted a 1st round pick on a 3rd/4th line grinder because he had "jam", whatever the hell that means
When you say reportedly turned down much higher 1st for Dougie where are you gathering this from its first I heard of it but agree about the rest
 

Aussie Bruin

Registered User
Sponsor
Aug 3, 2019
9,947
22,131
Victoria, Aus
I'm going to have to disagree with this assessment.

Although, considering Jacobs is the owner of the Bruins, it is conceivable he treats them as his own personal property.

We have discussed this matter multiple times before and I see no need to rehash it. I respect your opinion on it but we disagree, which is fine.

But just specifically on the ownership, yeah of course the Bruins are literally Jacobs' property. Such is the American private capitalist model in sport and while I don't particularly like it it's what you have. But I would argue that there are different ways of approaching that, and I would say that the best and most appropriate way to treat a sporting franchise, especially one with the history, importance and emotional attachments of the Bruins, is as a custodian. You are caring for the organization, looking after it on behalf of its fans and ensuring its health and integrity for future generations. On top of that I would say that you have an obligation to the STHs in particular who invest a lot of time and money in the franchise, to keep them informed, engaged in and, at least broadly speaking, satisfied with the direction the team is heading in. That means speaking regularly through the media or directly to the fans in keeping them abreast of what's happening, and why, of having some sense of accountability for actions taken and appreciating supporter concerns and points of view.

And I just don't believe that the Jacobs and their acolytes do anywhere near enough of this, and that their attitude in owning the club is too lofty, imperial and money-driven. It's not terrible and they do some things well, but it could be a lot better. But that's just me.
 

PlayMakers

Moderator
Aug 9, 2004
25,221
25,085
Medfield, MA
www.medpuck.com
It sounds like they haven't decided what they want to do with the 4th line. Neely said, "I think Monty can attest to this, we’re still tinkering with the bottom part of our lineup. I think we have a really solid top nine, and it’s just a matter of what flavor we want for the fourth line."

I assume when he says flavor he's talking bout young vs old, fast vs heavy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

MattFromFranklin

Fire Sweeney and Neely
Jun 19, 2012
4,138
3,072
Franklin, MA
That was closest I seen anyone talk about 2015 draft that way when Neely said all GMs make mistakes.


When you say reportedly turned down much higher 1st for Dougie where are you gathering this from its first I heard of it but agree about the rest



Friedman touched on the Hamilton trade in his blog. Basically said it was rushed and that teams who otherwise would've been interested in Hamilton had no clue he was available. That's maddening.

Ev-IGW6XAAAy0Hj


Friedman also mentioned that things were "close" with Colorado. Considering that the Avs needed a Defenseman and if Mirtle's report was accurate, then Sweeney turned down the 10th overall pick. Maybe because the Avs didn't offer multiple 2nd round picks? In the "Behind The B" episode of the 2015 draft, Sweeney was obsessed with getting "at least 2 2nds" for Hamilton. Colorado ended up trading for Nikita Zadorov.

Ev-IH0_WgAM4bui
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad