So Hawks give up Wise and Mitchell/Beaudin, and still take Ryan's salary back??
So Hawks give up Wise and Mitchell/Beaudin, and still take Ryan's salary back??
I dont think this team should be rushing to give away top prospects if we aren't sure the core (especially Jonny) is going to live up to the standards. If the price for getting rid of Seabrook is one of Beaudin, Boqvist, Dach, or Mitchell i would wait.I'm Ready for a let down on the sweetener being Boqvist or Dach.
Do it Stan, Seabrook/Mitchell/+ for Eriksson.
I don't know ... I really don't think it's wise to give up a top prospect like Mitchell or Beaudin ( certainly not Dach or Boqvist ) to get rid of Seabs. TT is thriving in Carolina and I can't stomach watching yet another one of our young future stars shining in another city. Don't want to give up our 2020 first either!I'm Ready for a let down on the sweetener being Boqvist or Dach.
Do it Stan, Seabrook/Mitchell/+ for Eriksson.
I don't disagree, although I'd point out that the Bickell move had to be made to get under the cap by a deadline, whereas SB isn't under that same pressure atm.
I've said this as well. That deal I proposed is about the only thing I could think of that wouldn't involve one of Bo/Dach. That contract is untradeable for at least this season and next.I dont think this team should be rushing to give away top prospects if we aren't sure the core (especially Jonny) is going to live up to the standards. If the price for getting rid of Seabrook is one of Beaudin, Boqvist, Dach, or Mitchell i would wait.
Clarification - if its one of Bo or Dach, i wouldnt even consider it.
He was traded June 15th, 3.5 months before supposedly having to be under the cap so his hands were not as strapped as believed around here, he made the trade because he didn’t care much about TT, he didn’t value him like many people did, he just doesn’t have the vision. There was many other avenues he could have went, he could have waited a bit as the summer is very long and if he wanted to give away TT there would have been a line up of teams willing to take that trade. How about get rid of Anisimov which TT was already a better player than him to get under the cap? Stan just didn’t care much for TT. A lot of fans here thought TT was soft and until about last year the notion was that he wasn’t that big of a loss and would say things like “where would he play on this team right now there is no place for him” and silly statements like that.
If it's Beaudin I'd do it without thinking About it.
He was traded June 15th, 3.5 months before supposedly having to be under the cap so his hands were not as strapped as believed around here, he made the trade because he didn’t care much about TT, he didn’t value him like many people did, he just doesn’t have the vision. There was many other avenues he could have went, he could have waited a bit as the summer is very long and if he wanted to give away TT there would have been a line up of teams willing to take that trade. How about get rid of Anisimov which TT was already a better player than him to get under the cap? Stan just didn’t care much for TT. A lot of fans here thought TT was soft and until about last year the notion was that he wasn’t that big of a loss and would say things like “where would he play on this team right now there is no place for him” and silly statements like that.
My bad, then, I thought it was right before the season. But either way, they had to move Bickell, which they don't here.
Because he’s getting the exact reaction he wants every time. I swear if everyone just ignored him he would more than likely just go away.You are forgetting the fact that you can only go so far over the cap so you have to make the move early so you can get other moves done.
This thread is about Bowman scouting a game. Why do you constantly bring up things that have nothing to do with the thread and try to hide it behind the “well we are talking about Bowman so he will automatically **** it up” veil?
Because he’s getting the exact reaction he wants every time. I swear if everyone just ignored him he would more than likely just go away.
...
This thread is about Bowman scouting a game. .....
From everything I've heard, it was JC's decision to add Crawford, not Stan's. So I doubt there is anything to Crawford being there other than getting some experienced eyes on a player, or possibly, be Bowman's drinking buddy.Speaking of which, anyone else think it is a little odd that Crawford is with him? Seems like the Barry Smith Issues all over again- didn’t JC’s record improve significantly after Smith left the scene?
I may be completely off base but given how dis-jointed the Hawks look seems like there could be some trust issues among team and staff that go back to the Q v Smith and Bowman days.
Speaking of which, anyone else think it is a little odd that Crawford is with him? Seems like the Barry Smith Issues all over again- didn’t JC’s record improve significantly after Smith left the scene?
I may be completely off base but given how dis-jointed the Hawks look seems like there could be some trust issues among team and staff that go back to the Q v Smith and Bowman days.
okay scratch that then, I had heard something about JC being onboard, but wasn't sure how much to trust it.......