Legend123
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2016
- 9,818
- 4,931
Broberg is your dude i believeFind the underagers in competitive leagues and draft them!
Broberg is your dude i believeFind the underagers in competitive leagues and draft them!
At this point i think trading the pick would make sense. I'm against trading 1st round pick but let's be honest it's unlikely a 15th overall pick will ready to play a big role before Price and Weber are too old. Price maybe goalies age well but not sure Weber will still be a top dman in the league by the time this pick will reach his prime.
Trading it for a LHD would make lot of sense. Like someone said Drouin+1st for a good young (under 28) LHD would make a lot of sense. There will be growing pain with Poehling but i like what i saw and i will be surprised if he doesn't become as good as Drouin. He can play wings too right? At this point anyway it's all in the hands of Kotkaniemi. If he becomes that steady 70 points (in 82 games) center we don't really need Drouin anyway as i believe Poehling will become a good two way top 6 center and we will be able to move Domi to the wing. The lineup could look like this in 2 years :
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Gallagher
Tatar-Poehling-Suzuki
Lehkonen-Danault-Shaw
Byron-Weal-Armia
If Suzuki doesn't work you can try to sign someone. There's still a possibility Armia figures it out too. The guys has good hands but he needs to find consistency in his game. I think at this point we should do a leap of faith and believe in Pehling and Kotkaniemi and use Drouin and the 1st round pick to solve one of our main issue which is the left side of the defense.
I agree, trade the pick, unless there’s some guy our staff is in love with around 15
Personally, I feel no pressure to get it all done next season or the one after that because both weber and Price are ageing. Price will be 34 three seasons from now. Weber will be 36. I'd rather draft well and have a strong young team in three years. Someone will replace Weber who will, by then, still be a strong 2nd pairing D. Price will still be able to deliver strong performances and one of Primeau or McNiven will be in the wings to replace him.
I wouldn't build around two or three years of two players. There needs to be a balanced view of the present and the future and, for that, you don't trade 1st round picks. There's a long list of elite talent that was drafted at 15th or later.
At this point i think trading the pick would make sense. I'm against trading 1st round pick but let's be honest it's unlikely a 15th overall pick will ready to play a big role before Price and Weber are too old. Price maybe goalies age well but not sure Weber will still be a top dman in the league by the time this pick will reach his prime.
Trading it for a LHD would make lot of sense. Like someone said Drouin+1st for a good young (under 28) LHD would make a lot of sense. There will be growing pain with Poehling but i like what i saw and i will be surprised if he doesn't become as good as Drouin. He can play wings too right? At this point anyway it's all in the hands of Kotkaniemi. If he becomes that steady 70 points (in 82 games) center we don't really need Drouin anyway as i believe Poehling will become a good two way top 6 center and we will be able to move Domi to the wing. The lineup could look like this in 2 years :
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Gallagher
Tatar-Poehling-Suzuki
Lehkonen-Danault-Shaw
Byron-Weal-Armia
If Suzuki doesn't work you can try to sign someone. There's still a possibility Armia figures it out too. The guys has good hands but he needs to find consistency in his game. I think at this point we should do a leap of faith and believe in Pehling and Kotkaniemi and use Drouin and the 1st round pick to solve one of our main issue which is the left side of the defense.
I’d be ok with Harley, Heinola has looked very good in a men’s league though and that’s impressive for a defenseman in his draft year.
Ok sorry I didn’t know that we were drafting our saviour at #15.Just because they are the 'elite' on the roster, does not make them truly elite. If if if...doesn't change the fact that the lack of truly elite talent (outside of the crease) has continually sunk the Habs every year since the dynasty ended.
Yup, 4 more points, and in the playoffs, while the Habs with their so called elite have missed the playoffs 3 of the last 4 seasons.
Finally, while the prospect pool is much improved, they are still lottery tickets as far as I am concerned. And I suggest that you ask anyone who follows prospects league wide, and see if anyone thinks that a Hab prospect projects as having elite potential.
If he's ranked higher than 15, doesn't that mean it's a reach for us? Might not be a massive reach but I see both Mackenzie and Cosentino have him outside their top 20. He could be like Kotka and rise late as well thoughHe had around a 0.5 ppg as a D year defenseman. He's a smooth skating LD with a complete skillset. I dont see how thats a reach at 15.
If he's ranked higher than 15, doesn't that mean it's a reach for us? Might not be a massive reach but I see both Mackenzie and Cosentino have him outside their top 20. He could be like Kotka and rise late as well though
Sounds goodWell, there's a lot of variability after around 10. Bob's list had Heinola at 24 in January, and he usually compiles the list from comments he gets from the preceding months, so there's always a delay between a players actual value among the scouting community and when the list gets published. The most accurate one is always the last one he compiles, after the U18s - just before the draft. Even there, you always need to look at how much every player's a consensus at the rank he's listed. Meaning, there's likely a much stronger consensus with less variability for someone like Boldy at 7, vs Heinola at 24. It's just the nature of the draft and how there's a steep dropoff in "guaranteed" talent after the very top.
I don't see someone with his pedigree as a reach at 15, personally. As far as production, he had the best ppg season in the last 30 years for an U18 in Liiga. Well, it's Honka, but he only played 20 games.
Unlike Kokkonen, he doesn't have skating issues (though Kokkonen is excellent himself). Unlike Honka, he neither has size+strength or defensive issues. I wouldn't call him a reach even higher than 15.
Trade the pick and Drouin to Edmonton for Poolparty and someone like Lucic to make Edmonton's cap situation work.
Insanity. Edmonton is already driving their guys to the airport based on this post.
Trade the pick and Drouin to Edmonton for Poolparty and someone like Lucic to make Edmonton's cap situation work.
I mean you’re not even including their 1st or swapping them??? No thanks.
It's not that insane. Poolparty hasn't had a great start to his career but he's still young with potential, so I'd gladly trade the pick for him. Drouin for Lucic is pretty much a wash since they have as many years left on their contracts with similar caphits. Drouin brings more speed which could work on McDavid's wing, and Lucic brings more size which the Habs are lacking. Lucic also played well under Julien in Boston.
Lucic, like Alzner, doesn't belong to NHL anymore... Come on !
Dunno, I think that a fresh start could do some good for him. Maybe I'm wrong and the trade blows up in Montreal's face but you gotta take risks if you wanna win.