cpsman
Registered User
- Aug 18, 2010
- 2,101
- 640
I posted this as a comment in the main threads. I'm just wondering what people think about this. I'm not saying that this will happen, I just think that it's something that I would consider if I were McDavid.
McDavid must be absolutely frustrated seeing the disaster unfold around him as he is entering his prime years. While he should be leading a team that is a perennial Stanley Cup contender, they cannot even consistently get into the playoffs.
If I were him, I'd be booking a meeting with my agent and Katz, demanding him to really make drastic changes - getting rid of the OBC and Nicholson. Clearly these people are not good judges of talent (player or managerial) and cannot run a successful hockey franchise. If not, I would threaten to publicly ask for a trade. This would have grave consequences for Katz as McDavid is the face of the franchise and is who is selling tickets, jerseys etc. He is the prime money maker for Katz (from a hockey perspective.)
Katz would have to choose his buddies, or choose his money making star. Should he choose the former, he would be absolutely vilified by Edmonton fans and I personally think most fans would side with McDavid. I know it is an unpopular option, and many would criticize McDavid for not being "gentlemanly" and "an ambassador of the sport" but who really cares at this stage? The alternative for McDavid is spending his prime years in a losing culture. He needs to be selfish and think of his career, not the image of the Oilers or the NHL. Hopefully it wouldn't get to him having to publicly make any trade demands though.
I think if it came to this perhaps this would twist Katz's arm and force him to make drastic changes and actually take the ownership of this team more seriously. The only other thing that would force is hand is losing out money from season ticket holders, but I'm not sure there is enough people giving up on the team to pressure ownership. McDavid probably has more leverage than we think and could force more hopeful change.
Just wondering what everyone's thoughts are on this.
McDavid must be absolutely frustrated seeing the disaster unfold around him as he is entering his prime years. While he should be leading a team that is a perennial Stanley Cup contender, they cannot even consistently get into the playoffs.
If I were him, I'd be booking a meeting with my agent and Katz, demanding him to really make drastic changes - getting rid of the OBC and Nicholson. Clearly these people are not good judges of talent (player or managerial) and cannot run a successful hockey franchise. If not, I would threaten to publicly ask for a trade. This would have grave consequences for Katz as McDavid is the face of the franchise and is who is selling tickets, jerseys etc. He is the prime money maker for Katz (from a hockey perspective.)
Katz would have to choose his buddies, or choose his money making star. Should he choose the former, he would be absolutely vilified by Edmonton fans and I personally think most fans would side with McDavid. I know it is an unpopular option, and many would criticize McDavid for not being "gentlemanly" and "an ambassador of the sport" but who really cares at this stage? The alternative for McDavid is spending his prime years in a losing culture. He needs to be selfish and think of his career, not the image of the Oilers or the NHL. Hopefully it wouldn't get to him having to publicly make any trade demands though.
I think if it came to this perhaps this would twist Katz's arm and force him to make drastic changes and actually take the ownership of this team more seriously. The only other thing that would force is hand is losing out money from season ticket holders, but I'm not sure there is enough people giving up on the team to pressure ownership. McDavid probably has more leverage than we think and could force more hopeful change.
Just wondering what everyone's thoughts are on this.