Anaheim is 2 pts back with two games at hand. Plus have the tie breaker.
We're not winning the div.
GDT: Sharks Vs Flames 24/3/14, 6PM.
- Thread starter Barrie22
- Start date
Anaheim is 2 pts back with two games at hand. Plus have the tie breaker.
We're not winning the div.
It's pretty easy to see that the Ducks are taking the Pacific division title with how the Sharks can't play against any team outside of the playoffs.
Leidi J
Registered User
Yeah they dothe Flames thrashed them. Some of you need to quit crying about every loss. You'd think the Sharks were the Oilers.
It's not about the loss. That happens. Whatever I'm already over it.
It's the play and decision making that is an ongoing thing over multiple games that I would like to complain about... if that's ok with you?
Quid Pro Clowe
Registered User
I'm tired.of people acting like LA is a bad matchup and an automatic loss. These teams are as even as it gets. Could make a great series and a great rivalry.
YoungSinatra
Fade Away
What decisions you talking about?It's not about the loss. That happens. Whatever I'm already over it.
It's the play and decision making that is an ongoing thing over multiple games that I would like to complain about... if that's ok with you?
SJ has 1 win against LA in 4 games. It was in a shootout against their back up. How can anyone say we have a chance.
LA is a bad matchup. There's no good outcome from playing them. We either lose, or we barely win in a grueling 7 game series and are too beat up to put up much of a fight for the next round.
weastern bias
worst team in the league
Yeah they do
This Sharks team only scoring one goal against that Flames team is an abject failure, and IMO is a comparable embarrassment (or should be) to Edmonton allowing 8 goals by anybody
Negatively Positive
Mr. Longevity
- Mar 2, 2011
- 10,299
- 2,211
Okay just quickly looked through Anaheim's games against bottom feeders. They lost once to Carolina, once to Florida, and once to Calgary. That's it. They usually blow out the bad teams so yeah not looking good...
Quid Pro Clowe
Registered User
Yes, because the other games have been 1-sided affairs....
These teams were seperated by 1 goal last year and the Sharks actually have forward depth this year.
Gene Parmesan
Dedicated to babies who came feet first
It's not about the loss. That happens. Whatever I'm already over it.
It's the play and decision making that is an ongoing thing over multiple games that I would like to complain about... if that's ok with you?
Hey go ahead. Its frustrating that they loss when they could have won. Looks like Pavelski will be back centering the third line so we'll see if they can get any traction. We'll see.
Gilligans Island
Registered User
magic school bus
***********
Fistfullofbeer
Moderator
Still tons of games left. One of them against Anaheim as well. I am not crying about 2nd place already but I do think the Sharks need to step up.
Leidi J
Registered User
Coaching decisions. Lineup decisions.
From the big things like continuing to destroy our depth by keeping Pavs up on Jumbo's wing when he hasn't scored in 6-7 games and deluding themselves into thinking (as much as he's improved) that Sheppard is anything close to a 3C on a playoff team. To small things like using Sheppard in the shootout tonight. Yes, reward guys for having a good game... but not when we need the points like we do.
All that depth on forward combined put up 1 goal on Karri friggin Ramo and Calgarys D tonight. LA and Quick are eons better than Calgary and Ramo.
Quid Pro Clowe
Registered User
Sharksfan83
Registered User
- Jul 27, 2010
- 3,495
- 812
Some of the reactions are priceless on here. Like there's people who will reply twice in 5 minutes at their disgust. - Ok they lost,.. In a shootout..
It's not like they were hammered terribly. Yes, the race to the pacific title is close and you need every point you can take, but they're not going to go 9-0-0 until the end of the year.
It's not like they were hammered terribly. Yes, the race to the pacific title is close and you need every point you can take, but they're not going to go 9-0-0 until the end of the year.
Quid Pro Clowe
Registered User
YoungSinatra
Fade Away
Anomie2029
Registered User
Yeah... The Ducks were thrashed by the Flames...
But out of interest do they have series losses to Buffalo, and Nashville, and then two losses to Calgary, a loss to edmonton, caps, florida, Islanders, and Winnepeg?
We have performed against the top teams generally, but we play to the level of our opposition, when we should be putting pucks in net against them.
But out of interest do they have series losses to Buffalo, and Nashville, and then two losses to Calgary, a loss to edmonton, caps, florida, Islanders, and Winnepeg?
We have performed against the top teams generally, but we play to the level of our opposition, when we should be putting pucks in net against them.
weastern bias
worst team in the league
YoungSinatra
Fade Away
Yeah, missing Hertl is hurting that depth to get Pavs back to the third line I hear that. Who's a better choice in the shootout? I'm perfectly fine with Shep in the shootout.
Ad
Upcoming events
-
Game 2 Ontario Reign @ Coachella Valley Firebirds - Coachella Valley Firebirds leads series 1-0Wagers: 3Staked: $425.00Event closes- Updated:
-
Game 6 Dallas Stars @ Colorado Avalanche - Dallas leads series 3-2Wagers: 14Staked: $8,775.00Event closes- Updated:
-
-
-