Socks
Stuff and Things Man
FIFYI can't speak for anyone else, but this would totally sell me, if only for the meese.
FIFYI can't speak for anyone else, but this would totally sell me, if only for the meese.
Hedman, Karlsson, Suban all had peak offensive output at 26. John Carlson at 30 and Josi at 29. Doughty at 27. Burns is an outlier at 34.We're trading him this summer, that much is assured. But this bit is probably wrong. D like him usually don't peak at age 24. More like 30. Norris winners are on average over 30. Seth Jones will probably bounce back sharply getting away from Torts' turtlefest and be an elite defender, and an absolute steal, for whoever acquires him.
Hedman, Karlsson, Suban all had peak offensive output at 26. John Carlson at 30 and Josi at 29. Doughty at 27. Burns is an outlier at 34.
So, you're wrong from an offensive perspective.
Torts didn't seem to throttle Z's offensive output. Seth Jones is not offensively dynamic-he's decent. Most people get caught up in how smooth his skating is and overrate him. Seth Jones doesn't deserve to be in any serious conversation about Norris Winners.
This isn’t confirmed. It’s Eklund. So he hasn’t “declared” anything official yet.With Jones declaring he’s not going to sign until next year.
Torts didn't seem to throttle Z's offensive output.
With Jones declaring he’s not going to sign until next year, two things become clear. One is that his value will be highest with only serious contenders. Thus, the return will be futures. As draft picks will likely be a centerpiece and the trade happens before this year’s draft, I’m looking at the Kings, Canucks, Blackhawks and maybe the Sharks as teams who likely think their ready that possess attractive picks. From there it falls to the quality of the prospect they’ll include.
Of course if the Jackets wait, then it becomes a 2022 pick. The problem with that is the draft position is unknown and it’s easy to end up with a pick in the 20s - not so great when dealing Jones (though just fine when it’s Savard or Nick). I tend to agree with @Cyclones Rock - value diminishes the longer you hold him.
If Eklund's allegations are true that Jones wants to go to free agency regardless of team, it shows that the CBJ are just unlucky rather then having something fundamentally wrong with the team or city. They had Johansen who wanted to raise the bar of what players coming off their ELC make. They had Panarin who only wanted to play for the Rangers. Nobody knows why PLD wanted moved but it wasn't the city (his IG shows him having plenty of fun out on the town and he just bought a really nice condo) or the team as constructed (coach, competitiveness). They just keep getting stars who have an ulterior motive.
People also either forget or don't recognize that Jones was asked to play a different role being paired with Z. He wasn't asked to drive play but to support and protect. When given freedom he showed he can carry the puck and play in the offensive zone. This won't show in the analytics.I just noticed this bit.
The difference is that Z is a dynamic pointman and Seth isn't. Seth is a puck rusher and a great open-ice scorer. He doesn't have the small area skill that Zach has. Zach can shimy and shake and open up lanes. So obviously one of these guys is going to get hurt a lot more by a system that removes rushing from the game in favor of more static play (dump-and-chase, etc...).
People also either forget or don't recognize that Jones was asked to play a different role being paired with Z. He wasn't asked to drive play but to support and protect. When given freedom he showed he can carry the puck and play in the offensive zone. This won't show in the analytics.
Maybe i want clear, it was his partner. The only time he was given free run was the Safe is Death season. Which happened to be 2 years ago. The time many like to point to him being "good". He's always been asked to cover. After Bob, both were asked to tone it back but Seth always carried more responsibility.He was paired with Zach almost from the get go. Torts experimented with splitting them up but always went back to that top pairing. So his play changed, but it was the system and not his partner that was the driver of that.
People always say that about the top pending UFAs/trade bait. We were screaming from our lungs about how Panarin was underrated meanwhile a big portion of HF was saying he wasn’t worth near 10M. Now he’s an MVP candidate and people don’t remember that. But I do
It would be less damning because no matter what the city or the Jackets did, it wouldn't really change his mind. Hence, just bad luck.If the Eklund story is true I don't think it means any of that. It would sooner imply that Seth either 1) is very picky about where he's going long term, perhaps with just one or two destinations in mind or 2) Seth actually wants to be wined and dined as a literal UFA, which I still find unlikely. I don't think it means anything less damning or more damning about the Jackets.
In my my I don’t see them as true contenders……but I believe these are four teams that will add because they think that they can be contenders.As CBJW pointed out - that no-signing report is just Eklund, we'll know it's real if an actual journalist picks it up.
Now if there isn't any possibility of a sign-and-trade, I would say yes, the value is going to be highest with contenders, and they'll likely be paying in futures. Maybe there's a chance that Colorado dangles Girard, or maybe Toronto really wants to unload Marner's salary. But most likely it will just be futures. Those four teams you mentioned aren't serious contenders, I'm not sure if I misread you somewhere.
IMHO Colorado yes. Dallas... I don`t see any reason to take Guryanov but Hintz would be good.I just spent some time browsing Capfriendly to see if any logical trade partners jumped out. Didn't see any. The teams with cap space to take on Jones don't have much to offer other than picks and maybe prospects. And most of them are weaker teams with no real incentive to take Jones unless he indicates he will extend. If Ekund is to be believed that ain't going to happen.
Dallas would be an ideal candidate whose window is rapidly closing. They have 17mm to sign 8 to 9 guys so trading for Jones with picks/prospects seems to put them in a bind cap wise. Trading Hintz & Gurianov would work but I don't see them doing that. Bottom line unless I'm totally off the wall I don't see them as a fit.
Colorado if they trade Girard plus would be almost cap neutral. I don't know if that works for CBJ but it might.
Maybe our best bet is to wait for TDL and dump him to a contender for picks in the upcoming 22 &23 drafts?
Everything Jones does on the ice has a positive impact on the perception of the player Werenski is, along with improving Werenski’s offensive/overall “statistics”.
Nothing Werenski does has a positive impact on ANYTHING, in regards to Jones.
I don’t understand how anybody can say anything negative regarding Jones and his potential cap hit, or question his ability as a #1D, and yet pass off the idea that the CBJ would be “fine” in the future/moving forward with Werenski filling the same role and making essentially the same amount, not to mention more than enough people seem ‘ok’ with the idea as Gavrikov as the #2D….
don't know if that works for CBJ but it might.
Maybe our best bet is to wait for TDL and dump him to a contender for picks in the upcoming 22 &23 drafts?