sennysensen
Registered User
- Feb 7, 2018
- 976
- 1,204
Keith is the only one wearing a nametag when he's the one guy everybody would recognize. Setting a good example of humility as the captain of the dads.
I thought we were alright. So sure.Will you give DJ credit for the adjustments he made in the 2nd intermission?
Because why would you want the game decided over an icing play? 1 goal games are exciting, why risk ruining them by gifting the winning team a chance like an o-zone face-off with an empty net ?Never really thought about it before, but yeah you're right. If you're not allowed to change lines on an icing why can you put your goalie back?
What was so lucky about it?Lucky win but I'll take it
11/16 in our last 8. Vamoslose 1 get 4 pts
Lose 1 get 4 pts
Lose 1 get 3 pts
11/18 pts in our last 9 games
We were lucky the team played better than the opposition...What was so lucky about it?
He has such a huge dbag energy about him.
Kind of crazy how you can have a bad game with a .931 sv%. I think he'd have liked to have both goals back.Happy about the win, but I don’t know why the gameplay always feels so sloppy with our players. We tend to make egregious giveaways or overskate pucks or flubb passes more than other teams. Also our goalies are allowing such shit goals, don’t care how great talbot has been why the f*** is that 2nd goal going in?
Good to see a bounce back game for Batherson and DeBrincat. Defensively I thought we were pretty good including the penalty kill
I suppose that is lucky given the last 4 years. Well improbable at least.We were lucky the team played better than the opposition...
according to the money puck power rankings, we're a much better team than Nashville...I suppose that is lucky given the last 4 years. Well improbable at least.
I couldn’t believe it. Unbelievably dumb.Why are they still playing 4 forwards!?
Hamonic is like a clone of his dad. Same stache….
There's sound logic and merit in your suggestion. The icing rule requires the team that ices the puck keep the same players on the ice (absent an injury). Why should the 'offending' team earn double benefit, (1) choose which player gets to exit (2) bring their goalie back out?I know I'm just salty because they didn't score on the empty net... HOWEVER
I think the rule should be if your goalie is pulled and you ice the puck, you should be required to take the faceoff with your goalie on the bench.
on another note. WINNN
Hamonic is like a clone of his dad. Same stache….
Ah, okay… thanks.gotta be his brother or something. way too young, and i think his dad passed away
Yes - Hamonic's dad passed away when he was very young, sadly.gotta be his brother or something. way too young, and i think his dad passed away
I wish they tracked shots by PP, ES and PK.Good start shots 8 to 2 in favour of Da Sens. Let's get that first one boys
He had plenty of time to take a good clearing shot and panicked.Parker Kelly with a weak backhander up the middle to try clear the zone on the PK, literally what does he bring to the table lmao
I wish I could.Cause I get what I want when I want it
I wish I could.Cause I get what I want when I want it
Stupid thing to do by Chabot. Reminds me of our goaltender smashing one of our player's hands on the boards a few years ago.poor Hamonic lmao. already in pain and get smashed in the head by friendly fire.
Stutzle sometimes gets dozy when he back checks until he realizes that an opposing F has beat him into the D zone.Guy makes multiple mistakes per game, is under 50% on the face off dot (Not good enough for a #1C) and doesn't back check nearly hard enough.
On the other hand, when he's IN the d-zone I've seen him make some of the nicest defensive plays I've ever seen a sens forward make, and he is one of the most dynamic offensive talents we've ever had.
He has been better than some of bigger D on the 3rd pair we have had to watch over the past few years.Branny is a liability