Devilsrock17
Registered User
- Jun 20, 2018
- 472
- 65
Why?
Seeing as the guy who said Andy is a one on one off goalie, I’d rather not acquire Andy when he’s heading into a season where he’s expected to play well and we wanna suck bad enough to have a good chance at the younger Hughes.These aren't necessarily straight up deals with no extra pieces...
Anderson for Moulson retained
Anderson for Darling
Anderson for Greiss
Anderson for Bouwmeester
Anderson for Markstrom/Nilsson
You guys get so caught up in Friedman's wording. He always talks like that when referring to rumours. It's a bit annoying, but it doesn't mean he's merely speculating. I wouldn't even be surprised if Anderson wanted to be traded at this point."Could look into "
These insiders starting to sound like palm readers at the state fair
Sounds like you're ready to join the panel.they could.
but they might not.
I was thinking about Philly, but I figure they might want to move one of their three goalies out before they think about swapping goalies in and out.
You guys get so caught up in Friedman's wording. He always talks like that when referring to rumours. It's a bit annoying, but it doesn't mean he's merely speculating. I wouldn't even be surprised if Anderson wanted to be traded at this point.
Ottawa does know they have to ice a team right?
When you say Ottawa you really mean Melnyk right? And no I dont think he does know that.
Ottawa does know they have to ice a team right?
Liver transplants aren't cheapHonestly nobody wants Anderson at full hit. 50% retained is feasible, but this is Melnyk we are talking. Even though he would save money, he would probably turn it down due to the fact he was eating dead money
I don't know what teams would be interested in him, but I definitely see him having some suitors. Buffalo makes a lot of sense I think.